you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]julesburm1891 25 insightful - 4 fun25 insightful - 3 fun26 insightful - 4 fun -  (2 children)

Idk. I think they understand that if they created an “inclusive” alternative it would just be a bunch of trans people. If there was an exclusively male bathhouse and a “queer” bathhouse, all the gay men (no matter how woke they are) would still go to the all male one. The “inclusive” one would be a bunch of Aidens and couple of bi guys with blue hair. Same thing with dating apps. If there was an all-female dating app, all the lesbians would be there and the transbians would just be angrily swiping past each other on Her. They bully LGB people for “inclusion” because they know we’d all just nope out if we could.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 17 insightful - 1 fun17 insightful - 0 fun18 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Exactly, they can't survive competition because of the fundamental difference that makes the exclusionary version superior. The only way to increase the diversity is to force people to be diverse, because people don't want sexual diversity in homosexual or heterosexual dating pools.

[–]julesburm1891 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. I think this is why Stonewall is fighting the LGB Alliance so much. They know damn well if an alternate group is allowed to have a fair say, most LGB people are going to go with the group that actually represents them.