you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

So true, female sexual entitlement has never led to the termination of a human life, let alone a million per year in this country alone. Women would never, ever dehumanize a class of human beings just to rationalize killing them. /s

If you've come up with a method whereby that "class of human beings" which is INSIDE A WOMAN'S BODY AGAINST HER WILL can be removed without killing them, OR her getting used as an unconsenting incubator for 9 months... I'm all ears.

[–]Preachy_Jerk 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Against her will? Unconsenting? How predictably dishonest. Those aren't terms to describe a situation that was a foreseeable, avoidable risk of actions she took knowingly and willingly. It's a lie and you know it.

Now you're going to pretend that all abortions are the result of rape, right? Thanks for proving my point, in any case.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

I mean, I realize that it's right there in your username, of course, but: could you take a break from the preachy jerkiness for just a sec?

Are you saying that people must ONLY have penis-in/near-vagina sex if they're ready to reproduce? Really?

Well, better run along and inform straight men that, gee, no more PIV for them unless a woman wants a baby. So they'd better learn to get along largely without it. Maybe just once or twice per woman, if she conceives easily! Or, if she's opted to go childfree, NEVER! Cuz it takes two to tango, you know.

Or maybe you've confused Homo sapiens with a species that perpetuates itself via parthenogenesis, or something?