DiscussionBig corporate™ says: "Trans rights!"

submitted by [deleted] from self.LGBDropTheT

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 23 insightful - 2 fun23 insightful - 1 fun24 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Always removing the Venus symbol from their period products because some female nonbinary genderspecial felt like that wasn't 'inclusive' enough.

Every celebrity who shat on JK Rowling, especially after her essay (Daniel Radcliffe, Emma Watson, etc)

The Canadian cancer society unironically putting on their website that transwomen have cervixes and can get cervical cancer

[–]insta 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

I can only imagine how many times that webpage had to be reviewed and how many drafts they went through to avoid offending anybody. Less than 300 words but I imagine it took a team a whole week or two to come up with that and consult with some diversity director.

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The whole site is a dumpster fire. This section about transwomen shouldn't be there at all though. Wokespeak has no place in medicine or academia. Transwomen don't have cervixes, therefore they can't get cervical cancer. But that's hate speech now apparently. There's another bit on the website about 'lesbian, bisexual, and queer women and breast cancer screenings':

Maybe you don’t identify with your breasts.

I'm almost certain the vast majority of women don't 'identify' with our breasts. But this kind of language is being pushed everywhere so genderspecials get brainwashed into thinking normal people wake up every day identifying with our gender roles and sex organs. Then websites like this come along and pander to the woke brigade.

[–]insta 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm almost certain the vast majority of women don't 'identify' with our breasts.

The irony of people talking about "identifying with body parts" on a website about cancer.

If only we could pretend away cancer the same way we do pretending a neovagina is real.

[–]hetisachoice 6 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Trump built the wall on the wrong side of the border.

[–]insta 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Stfu. Where do you think we get all this bullshit from?

There are brain dead lunatics who just copy & paste progressive talking points from the states which half the time aren't even applicable to Canada. It's such a joke.

[–]purrvana 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm glad I haven't spent money on my period in 8 years (menstrual cup for the win) otherwise I wouldn't know which company to buy period products from that still believe women exist. Even Diva Cup mentions something about "not only for cis women" on their website. At least they still use the word woman, I guess.

[–][deleted] 7 insightful - 2 fun7 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

It's ridiculous that after all of the shame women have endured over the years due to menstruating (and are even persecuted for it in some places), we can't even claim it as a marker of femaleness anymore. Companies like Always, Diva, and Thinx are too busy bending themselves into fractal designs trying to be woke.

[–]Three_oneFourWanted for thought crimes in countless ideologies 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

So by calling something a cervix means that if it becomes cancerous, it is cervical cancer?

I don't know much about cancer, but wouldn't any cancer grown in a "neocervix" be cancer of the part it was grafted from? Like scrotum cancer if the cancer is from a former scrotum?