Am I wrong for not wanting to watch movies/shows with trans actors?

submitted by [deleted] from (self.LGBDropTheT)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]mvmlego 2 insightful - 5 fun2 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 5 fun -  (2 children)

If I understand your comment correctly, then your principle implies that there's nothing morally wrong with, for example, an owner of a small restaurant refusing to serve an Asian person on account of their race. Is that correct, or is your principle only meant to apply customers' obligations, or am I misinterpreting your comment in some other way?

[–]SkinnyVanilla 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean people acting in their personal lives have no obligation to interact with anyone. If you are offering a service to the public, then yes in that case you have an obligation to offer that service without regard for your personal feelings.

[–]mvmlego 1 insightful - 5 fun1 insightful - 4 fun2 insightful - 5 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting. I view the choice of whether or not one buys/rents/views-in-cinema a movie as a business transaction like any other. Still, I can see the utility in only holding the expectation that people not discriminate in business transactions in cases where they're the ones providing the good or service, as opposed to consuming it.