you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 21 insightful - 1 fun21 insightful - 0 fun22 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Accusing people of internalized homophobia is these idiots' go-to when they couldn't simply attribute criticism of their toxic personalities to homophobia classic.

I've been accused of internalized homophobia countless times by people who think that me criticizing all the disgusting nooks and crannies of mainstream "gay culture" is somehow an attack on homosexuality, and not the corrosive movement that has coagulated around it. Yeah, sure buddy. Me saying that pozzing being made legal in california was disgusting, and that the glorification of daddy issues is super creepy is definitely an attack on homosexuality.

Because as we all know, being self destructive, opinionated and mentally unstable are undivorceable from homosexuality as a biological phenomenon. Yep. Definitely.

[–]DummDick_998634230[S] 14 insightful - 3 fun14 insightful - 2 fun15 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Accusing people of internalized homophobia is these idiots' go-to when they couldn't simply attribute criticism of their toxic personalities to homophobia classic. I've been accused of internalized homophobia countless times by people who think that me criticizing all the disgusting nooks and crannies of mainstream "gay culture" is somehow an attack on homosexuality

It really is annoying how you can't point out the degeneracy of certain people without them retreating to thinking you're against them for being gay. Like no, dude. I'm not calling you a degenerate for being gay, I'm calling you a degenerate for showing up with a harem of pups in bondage gear in a PRIDE EVENT with CHILDREN.

[–]RedEyedWarriorGay | Male | 🇮🇪 Irish 🇮🇪 | Antineoliberal | Cocks are Compulsory 15 insightful - 1 fun15 insightful - 0 fun16 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

These people are charlatans. I will never endorse degeneracy, and I will always encourage gay men to have good relationships with their fathers if they can. But these woke assholes want gay men to be separated from their families and their communities so that we will be dependent on woke culture as we die of drug use.

[–]PenseePansyBio-Sex or Bust 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

these woke assholes want gay men to be separated from their families and their communities

Which leads to THIS unsettling thought: who are the groups best-known for such tactics? Seeking to separate people from their families, friends... communities? Any and all sources of support? To ISOLATE them?

Abusers. And... cults.

[–]mvmlego 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Me saying that pozzing being made legal in california was disgusting

What exactly are you referring to here? I haven't followed the issue closely, but IIRC, knowingly putting a non-consenting person at risk of AIDS was downgraded from a felony to a misdemeanor. Is that accurate, or am I missing something big?

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You're right, it was downgraded from a felony to a misdemeanor and now carries up to 6 months prison time instead of far more warranted 3-8 year prison term.

Being made "legal" was an inaccurate statement on my part, it was years ago that I last read about the ruling so the details were very foggy. Still disgusting, especially that they did the same thing to knowingly donating HIV infected blood. The fact that people defended pozzing as a fetish astounded and revolted me to no end.

[–]mvmlego 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the clarification. The justification that I heard is that because treatment of AIDS has gotten much better, the life expectancy for someone who contracts it is longer, and therefore infecting someone with HIV is less harmful. I understand that reasoning, but 6 months still seems pretty light, especially for donating blood.

[–]deliciousdogfoodmy name isnt a puppyplay reference i swear 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't think that knowingly and intentionally infecting someone with a life threatening disease (To people with existing medical conditions it can still be a short term death sentence) resulting in them being dependent on a drug for the rest of their life that could potentially put them at the mercy of people like Martin Shkreli should be anything less than a criminal offense.

How is it fair at all to the people that now have to live with this shit that the person who did it to them gets basically a slap on the wrist? And this goes triple for intentionally donating infected blood. That's beyond malicious.