Ok? I never said there was a "gay gene". That framing is entirely wrong. That's the same silly framing the counter studies use. Do you need me to rephrase my statement to say that the specific gene was not isolated or can you stop the pedantic hair splitting?

Results, especially in the context of past studies, support the existence of genes on pericentromeric chromosome 8 and chromosome Xq28 influencing development of male sexual orientation.

It specifically found 2 regions of interest. I know it isn't "scientific" to assume that sexuality is affected by more than the 2 but I'll do so anyway and that assumption is way more sound than trying to assume it would need to be a single gene like the other papers seem to do.