you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BiHorror 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

And there is also nothing wrong with the disabled people wanting ableist slurs to be gone either. I cannot expect them to be "for all women" when they can't even stop and think about some of the slurs they use or usage of mental disabilities as negative connotation.

[–]NeedMoreCoffee~=[,,_,,]=^_^= 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

And what are those? Because you are really vague about what slurs you are upset about and you seem to mix up insults and slurs. You also consider idiot a slur while it was a medical term CENTURIES ago and has evolved into just being an insult without any medical connotation or targeting a specific group of people which is what a slur is.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I refrained from commenting on this post but OP is tilting at windmills here and doesn't know what s/he wants.

[–]BiHorror 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How exactly? I just stated that I believe hipocrisy shouldn't be tolerated. If slurs are so bad then none of them should be said. Not some, not two or three, but all. Or all can be said. That's it. I had no problem with people using them, it's just the hipocrisy and act of policing other discriminatory language (but not ableist) that bugs me.

We talk about how TQ+ shouldn't use homo/biphobic slurs but we sit here and use mental disorders as ways to insult them (as i stated to some others, and thank god for moderators existing, you can go to the moderation log and see how some try to use autism as an insult for example if you go through it). You can go outside of this sub, and see people use retard or autism without being called out. But I'm the one who us tilting at windmills? Ugh.

[–]ArthnoldManacatsaman🇬🇧🌳🟦 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blah blah blah hypocrisy. Several people have asked you for specific references and you haven't delivered. Also, are you familiar with the etymological fallacy?

[–]BiHorror 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These are terms that have been used against disabled people as a way to dehumanize and belittle them in the past. They were medical terms but as I said, they then became a way to belittle disabled people. This would be considered slurs. Today, they're considered everyday insults because they "changed" in meaning, the thing is, this "change in meaning" still connects to the original meaning. For example, idiot is used to describe someone who is untelligent, and this is also how it was used in the past. Instead of just creating a new word to do this, they choose a slur. If you like, I can give you evidence on why these are considered slurs.

without any medical connotation or targeting a specific group of people which is what a slur is.

And with this logic, this can be used for other types of slurs. Within time, they can "change meaning" as well. The thing is, people don't allow it to and that's what I find hypocritical about this. How can we be okay with xyz (which, not even using idiot, but I have seen people use autism and retard, which are slurs still and not called out for it. Just on here from time to time or another sub but on other websites and off the internet. Not only this but people using disabilities to describe something in negative connotation) but say "stop! You can't say that" to others. It's either all can be used or none can.

Either all slurs are okay or none are. Anything can be used as an insult or none can. If we are selective, we are also being just as language policing and hypocritical.

Edit: words