all 6 comments

[–][deleted] 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (0 children)

this dude has no brain cells. it must be all the furry porn he consumes.

[–]ChodeSandwichtender and moist 11 insightful - 1 fun11 insightful - 0 fun12 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Why is he acting so disappointed about it? Is he 12? Being gay (or anything else) isn't an mysterious vibe or an aesthetic that's being defiled by sexual urges, it is sexual urges, and sexual urges are "fixed" on physicality/anatomy because that's the entire point. Too bad. Find some other way to romanticize your life, maybe even something that requires effort and self discovery instead of pretending that certain boners make you deep.

[–]julesburm1891 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So what does he think exclusively same-sex attracted people should be called if we can’t use “gay” to describe us? Just curious.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

People like this believe exclusive same sex attraction shouldn't exist at all. That's the point of changing the words. They think because their own "identities" rely on language to exist that ours do too.

[–]Jinera 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Ever since learning he is 30 I am even more done with him than before.

[–]GoValidateYourselfuseful lesbian 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Critfacts sounds like a 1950s American homophobe and a teenage boy at the same time. "Fixation on a body part", trying to make gay attraction sound like a fucking pathology. Nobody calls heterosexuality "fixation on a body part".