you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Lessom 16 insightful - 1 fun16 insightful - 0 fun17 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

What I don't get is if these people define bisexuality (incorrectly) and say its attraction to 2 or more genders. Then what is the point of saying Polysexuality is different as it's attraction to many genders.

Doesnt the 2 or more cover the many already? Logic doesn't follow these people.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Lol. I think bi ppl agree about 2. I don’t know why the TRAs insist on adding extra crap to a word that literally means only 2, and not 2+

[–]wafflegaffWoman. SuperBi. 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Because endless grasping, that's why.