you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]KCStuffedAnimal[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Men turning Lesbians into asexual women? Asexuality, a subcategory of bisexuality? You remind me of an amateur comedian, grabbing desperately for punchlines before he crashes and burns! Tell me another one; maybe next time I'll laugh!

No doubt it's best to let Lesbians and Bisexual persons speak for themselves; methinks there are a few who disagree with you. Maybe even more than a few. At best, your claims are wishful thinking and at worst, they're an attempt at gaslighting!

That annoying habit of trying to blur sexual orientation definitions is one reason why folks are starting to turn away from "queer" activists and activism. Re-defining someone else's identity to suit your own socio-political agenda, that's just plain rude. I could easily use rougher language, but let's keep things family-friendly.

[–]Ko-hi 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Oh my god are you being intentionally obtuse. You're twisting my words into something I never said.

Asexual = equal attraction to both genders, namely zero. It's a separate sexuality but it's most similar to bisexuality, due to the equal attraction aspect. 0=0. I am 30, I literally thought I was bisexual all my life until a year ago.

A lesbian feels 0 attraction towards a man. I used this comparison to point out what it feels like, to contrast that other person who said it's about not wanting sex. I did not say men make lesbians asexual WTF

[–]KCStuffedAnimal[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Why should I twist your words when you do such a great job twisting them yourself? You don't need my help. If twisted analyses bother you so much, then stop drawing parallels with people whose life experiences you don't understand! But do they really bother you? I doubt it. The so-called "LGBTQ+ community" that you claim membership in encourages blurring identity distinctions and creating false equivalence. That's one reason why "G" is the only letter I identify with!

[–]indeepshadowsBi woman 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You're on TRA levels of willfully misunderstanding your opponent. Congrats.

[–]KCStuffedAnimal[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

You're the one who doesn't understand. I have no opponents here. We're just talking and disagreeing. At ease, soldier, go back to your barracks.