you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

If you kept statistics of the IP addresses, you could send those to whatever government you have and if you could show that the networks themselves have been compromised, that would be a matter of national security.

They do not care about a site like saidit, get real. There's also a high likelihood they're supportive of the attacks anyway. Also the IPs don't fall in ranges, as I said. I've gathered long-term statistics about the IP grouping and there is no pattern!

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Your analysis clearly is of low quality. They wouldn't be interested in such details to save saidit, but they would be interested in knowing an adversary is on their networks, but like I said, the most likely explanation is that your analysis is flawed. If I had such a capability, I would deploy it against high value targets.

[–]magnora7 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

They already know what's going on on their networks, they have access to the backbones. You don't understand how this works

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I feel like I am talking to a primate. Feel free to tell me about your academic degrees and I might want to take you serious, even though you are not replying in any intelligent fashion; if you were an AI, I would press the thumb down button.

[–]stupidfucker 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I feel like I am talking to a primate

PRETTY MUCH EVERY THING HE SAYS ABOUT IP ADDRESSES IS INCORRECT.

https://youtu.be/RRAWb_qsRS8