you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Isn't the concept behind the sub itself an indication of mental malfunction?

Rule #1 on the right is like a confession.

[–]FlippyKing 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I thought the main purpose of the sub was for team QT to test out and improve their sophistry as they try to keep the woke masses bamboozled. Rule 1 just looks like asking us to be polite but I lose patients with idiots quickly, as the above conversation talking to a rock with that is the OP demonstrate.

[–]TheCoolestAlphabetic[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

What do you mean?

[–]Node 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

IMO, it's a bad sign when your lexicon includes "non-slur" terms for sexual degeneracy. Since I'm making an effort to not blatantly break saidits main rules, I'll just leave it at that.