Why is a constructed penis from tissues or stem cells that looks and feels like a real penis and is as functional as a real penis still not a real penis? What makes the constructed/artificial different from the actual thing when both look and feel the same?

submitted by [deleted] from self.GenderCriticalGuys

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]kwallio 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

The technology for this doesn't exist so why wank about it?

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]kwallio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

    I still don't understand why you are asking the question. What is the end game of such wankery? I don't want to answer the question because it sounds like its leading up to some completely disengenuous gotcha argument.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]kwallio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

      Because DUH its not the same as a penis someone was born with. Even if the penis is identical in many ways it was still created in a lab and surgically attached. I'm not sure why anyone would want the answer to this question from someone else. I mean you can call it a penis if you want but its still a transplanted organ. People that get transplanted organs have lifelong medical problems, it'd be a mistake to assume someone with a transplanted liver was exactly the same as a person with their own liver.

      [–]DustinM 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      There would be no issues common to current transplant technology from a stem cell grown organ. The organ would be the same organ that it replaced. My stem cells used to grow a liver would make it my liver (or penis).

      [–]kwallio 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      WHats your agenda?