you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

AGP individuals as “Trans”

Yes, yes! This really encompasses the whole "truscum vs tucute" dogmatic spat, i.e. that "transgender" was created as an umbrella term to sneak in perverts through the trojan horse of medicalized gender dysphoria/identity disorder.

The best solution may actually to side with the transmedicalists in simply insisting on the old paradigm - the epistemology of "transsexualism" medical disorder that is clearly-definable by a diagnosis of prolonged gender identity disorder.

That's the one strategy with a near-guaranteed outcome of halting the insanity - by codifying things in law with a scientific basis and essentially locking the discourse there.

[–]one1won 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I’m a hardliner, myself, but such a course might also put the kibosh on self ID/gender fluid BS, yes. Might. Sigh. Still doesn’t address institutional capture or the “orientation” classification question or sex stereotypes (Equality Act definition of sex is also sex stereotypes, ffs!). Couldn’t sex stereotypes be used against homosexuals just as well as against women? So mightn’t help enough.

[–]jjdub7Gay Male Guest Commentator 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Couldn’t sex stereotypes be used against homosexuals just as well as against women?

Yep, that was the basis of last years' SCOTUS employment rulings with respect to Title VII and sex-based discrimination. One of Kavanaugh/Gorsuch's breakout moments.