you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Like I said, I see a pattern, and it's funny how you're still trying to deny that you were disagreeing.

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap. I'm now wondering if you would have that same thought if I responded to you with a different username.

So, you have an issue with me not agreeing nor disagreeing and just posting a theory to add to your theory?

You're clearly implying that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap, the bullcrap being that porn is one of the reasons why women's status has gone backwards in these past few decades.

Technically, I proposed a theory and no, it was not related to porn, it was actually just me adding to a list of theories.

Edit: Wording

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It's really obvious you're lying. What you meant was obvious to absolutely everyone and I already spelled it out for you.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

It's really obvious you're lying. What you meant was obvious to absolutely everyone and I already spelled it out for you.

I didn't lie about anything and have no idea what you think I'm lying about (you're talking about that comment about the porn industry right? Ig so, state your accusatio, and if you think I lied, you have to prove it.

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The lie:

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

The proof:

What I said:

I think the rise of porn is a big reason why.

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

edit (addition):

And then:

I said:

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"?

I was clearly implying here that you were making a false assumption.

You said:

don't react to crass, baseless assumptions

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The lie:

I never was disagreeing (to clarify, about your comment on porn).

The proof:

What I said:

I think the rise of porn is a big reason why.

What you replied with after quoting the above:

I'm willing to bet that some feminist researcher ran out of ideas and was grasping at bullcrap

Your "evidence" does not back up your accusation. How does my reply "disagree" with your comment?

And then:

I said:

Lmfao so you're continuing to assume I get my information from "feminist articles"?

I was clearly implying here that you were making a false assumption.

You said:

don't react to crass, baseless assumptions

Still not relevant. How have I lied and how am I still assuming? You have yet to prove your case and have taken my advice about how you should respond out of context (I was trying to be helpful there).

[–]usehername 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I've spelled it out for you one too many times. Take care.

[–]TheOnyxGoddess 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're "spelling it out" is using my action to your comment as the evidence, not my response itself.You can't win the argument so you're trying to gaslight me into thinking I'm wrong, that's a symptom of a narcissistic personality disorder. My response is still a benign response that doesn't mean anything more than it says. You might as well be accusing someone of planning to rob the bank because he went into the bank. Have fun with your self-victim rhetorics.