you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]emptiedriver 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

has anyone actually seen this? Do we know for sure it's not meant as a more subtle telling of the fable where the reader understands the sheep are still in danger at the end? I just find it so hard to believe that both the reference to the very famous story and the images which seem to make extremely clear that the wolf is a wolf, are not meant to be grasped.

[–]BiologyIsReal 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

You can read the book here.

[–]emptiedriver 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

wow, yea just as that website says, it might have taken nothing more than a wink in the illustration, but the way it's presented does seem to make it look as if the reader is meant to believe Brenda had some kind of change of heart, since the predatory behavior was made so explicit all the way through the book initially..