you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]lefterfield 18 insightful - 1 fun18 insightful - 0 fun19 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The problem is that it's an ok concept in theory, but when applied to an individual it's worse than useless. It's extremely divisive and is only becoming more so every year. If we want to talk about average privilege-based differences across different groups - sure, no problem. But no one should feel obligated to support strangers financially or offer emotional support just because they are "more privileged" according to this theory. It's never going to be accurate on an individual level, because we can't know 100% what someone else is going through. People that I would have expected to have perfect lives occasionally reveal major health issues, fears, or financial problems that I would otherwise have never known about. We can't judge individuals from the outside, knowing only the surface level of what happens in their lives. But yeah, I feel that people often ignore this reality when it comes to privilege theory.

[–]moody_ape 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

YES! exactly! they criticize the group by hating on individuals. and if you claim it's divisive or aything like that, they quickly say you just don't want to acknowledge your privilege.

[–]lefterfield 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, perfect summary of it! I wonder if it's a particularly American problem, because we're so used to thinking in individualistic ways? (And the west, generally) I know that many libfems seem to struggle with the class-based analysis of radical feminism, too. Maybe it's the same problem with both.