J.K. Rowling's latest novel isn't 'transphobic'

submitted by jet199 from (spectator.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Shesstealthy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Moreover a man dressing as a woman in order to facilitate committing a crime, ie as a disguise, does not equal a stunning and brave transwoman. I guess their logical problem is that if any historical evidence of a woman dressing as a man in order to facilitate social activity means she was really trans, the idea of someone donning a disguise for nefarious purposes must be one and the same.

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They have no logic. But what concerns me is all the normal people who are swallowing this gender insanity whole - politicians, judges, school administrators, librarians, teachers, scientists.

Look at all the booksellers who won't sell Rowling's new book. Book people are supposed to be the last bastion of sanity in a crazy world and against censorship, yet so many not only won't sell her book, they release these sanctimonious statements as if she were a world leader who had written a plan to round up and genocide kittens.

Collective insanity and we need to not give an inch. NO MALES IN WOMEN'S TOILETS.

In a few short years, "I just want to pee" has come to mean violent, sex-offending, heterosexual men in women's jail cells.

We need to Tell A Friend, Tell A Woman, just talk, about what's happening, as often as we can to as many people as we can. And we need to do it now.