J.K. Rowling's latest novel isn't 'transphobic'

submitted by jet199 from (spectator.co.uk)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]BEB 20 insightful - 6 fun20 insightful - 5 fun21 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

The faux-trage is ridiculous because there's nothing "transphobic," no matter how the screaming mob defines it, in the book.

I think Rowling played a game within a game. She knew that the book would be immediately labeled "transphobic" by Wokus Dei, but also knew that no evidence of anything remotely trans-critical would be found in the actual book, so, as people read the book, the Twitter mob, and their media enablers, will look like the testerical idiots they are.

Well played!

[–]moody_ape 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Wokus Dei

LOL

[–]BEB 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

As far as I know, Graham Linehan, the UK comedy writer and male GC champion, came up with Wokus Dei. At least, his Twitter account was where I first saw it.

[–]jet199[S] 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

I sort of wonder whether the Telegraph knew what they were doing as well.

[–]BEB 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I don't know what the Telegraph's motivation was, but I read that they hate Rowling because she's so liberal on many issues, but in the US, the complete lies being told by the media about Rowling's new book just goes to show how much money is behind Trans, Inc. They seem to have bought much of the mainstream US media.

The Daily Beast, INSIDER and Vanity Fair are all making spurious claims about Rowling's "transphobia" and/or this book, claims that can be disproved simply by reading Rowling's actual words.

I think Rowling's smartest course would be to not sue these publications for libel but instead let people read the book for themselves, as millions will, and find out that she has not said anything "transphobic."

Plus, as I keep saying, most people are TERFs, so as these moronic media outlets fan the flames against Rowling, more and more people will realize how lunatic-fringe trans activism and gender ideology is, and, as it hits the schools and women's sports more, they will reject it.

IMO, one of the reasons Don the Con's cries of "fake news" has gained so much traction in the US is because the US media has lost any credibility on gender issues with their relentless pumping out of pro-gender ideology propaganda that no one but brain-washed youth can take seriously at all.