all 11 comments

[–]artetolife 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Not to mention that wherever these "third genders" exist, they were/are almost always assigned roles for people deemed not gender-conforming enough, or out of some percieved necessity like bacha posh. They never resemble modern, western trans people.

[–]Complicated-Spirit 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And with few exceptions, the option to be “third gender” was limited to men. The only case I can think of in which women could become socially masculine were the sworn virgins of Albania, and those were put into that role by necessity (e.g., brother died and someone needs to “be a father” to his children), not choice.

[–]levoyageur718293 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I've said it before and I'll say it again - in every culture that had them, "third gender" was synonymous with "f-ggot."

[–]goobandit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Hopi language is different for men and women. If a man says hello to someone they way women say hello, it’s like record scratch to the elders. There’s a thin line between amusement and insult, as I understand it.