NAMBLA still has a chip on it's shoulder over how lesbians called for their removal back in the day...Any strange coincidence the "T" has been attacking the "L"

submitted by joeytundra from imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]just_lesbian_things 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

pedophiles have said themselves they generally prefer to target children without fathers.

Source?

benefits the pedophile stranger and the voyeurs who want to upload more porn

AKA men.

Men turning against women, shamed in communities for defending women (MRA clubs)...so women go unprotected and left alone to fend for themselves. They target easier "prey" and single moms are easier to groom too.

I think instead of "defending" or "protecting" women, men should work on calling out the rapists and pedophiles from within their midst. Men should work on holding abusive men accountable. Abuse happen because of the abusers, not the victims.

[–]joeytundra[S] 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

part of protecting women is holding abusive men accountable. MRA's however blame women for everything men do to women. No where did I say it's the victims fault.

Here is a source. Yes pedophiles do in fact go for who has the least support. Single mothers are targets but not the only targets. This is nothing new but swept under the rug. You can also do your own research. https://www.couriermail.com.au/news/queensland/pedophiles-target-single-mums-on-dating-sites-to-molest-their-children/news-story/8f26ef15be7a3813070964910fb07a4b

[–]just_lesbian_things 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nah, women don't need men to "protect" them from other men, children don't need men to "protect" them from other men. Everyone -men, women, and children- needs men to clean up their shit and stop being violent, rapey lil fuckers. Saying that women and children need men to keep them safe from other men is nothing short of a protection racket. I don't need a man's protection any more than a baker needs the mafia's protection. Men being "protectors" is some next level gender bullshit being spread to keep women in line and stroke the male ego.

The way I see it, we're being charitable towards men by giving them the benefit of the doubt. we're giving men a chance. A chance to sort their shit out, work out their personal problems. Because we believe in the humanity of men. We believe that, deep down, they are good. I think there are a lot more extreme methods we can take if we didn't hold such beliefs.

[–]tuesday 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I'm not hearing him suggest that women should stay with their husbands/boyfriends. That is a criticism said frequently tho so it's understandable that women here would feel accused.

What i got from all that, was, I wish more women would stay the hell away from men. Children are safest when there are NO men around.

[–]just_lesbian_things 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not hearing him suggest that women should stay with their husbands/boyfriends

And I'm not saying he suggested that. I'm saying that men need to sort their shit out. Our buddy has a white knight complex and believe himself to be some sort of savior. Women don't need saving, men do.

I wish more women would stay the hell away from men.

I do, but I'm a dyke and I try not to tell bihet women how to live their lives.

Children are safest when there are NO men around.

Yeahhh, but men are half the population and should do their share of child rearing. They were cared for as children once, and they benefit from new people joining society. If they really can't be trusted to not abuse children, then I think the cost of labor of childcare should be docked from their paycheck and given to women who are doing more than their share of work.