you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ekitten 47 insightful - 9 fun47 insightful - 8 fun48 insightful - 9 fun -  (2 children)

I remember in a conversation about abortion, someone posted a Friends still of Rachel saying "No uterus, no opinion", and of course the transwomen were mad at being excluded and cried transphobia. It's not even a trans-exclusionary statement since transmen have uteruses.

[–]Anna_Nym 14 insightful - 1 fun14 insightful - 0 fun15 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And the accepted "inclusive" language in reproductive justice is "people with uteruses" too.

Why should a transwoman expect to be included? They don't deal with either pregnancy or abortions.

[–]VioletRemi 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The same reason why being transphobic to transmen is fine, but towards transwomen is not fine.