you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]dancing_with_durga 38 insightful - 1 fun38 insightful - 0 fun39 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

CNN's "people with cervixes" nonsense while an article on men's health uses the word "men" 27 times has peaked me all over again: https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1288948978088804355

In a couple of years I think all the "Trans Women Are Women" brainwashed ninnies are going to be backtracking and retconning. We are going to get the word "woman" back. There are too many of us.

But this is the time when we know who the brave ones are. The ones who have a mind of their own. The ones who hear the first circular definition, or the first Orwellian argument that doesn't hold together, and immediately say "Hang on, this is bullshit."

I am going to remember the people who care about women.

[–]sisterinsomnia 24 insightful - 4 fun24 insightful - 3 fun25 insightful - 4 fun -  (1 child)

Hear, hear. I have a folder full of other examples of the differences between word use in health articles aimed at men vs. women. I have never seen 'ejaculators' used anywhere, and prostate-havers was used only in Teen Vogue's famous anal sex article (which tries to make nonprostate-havers accept anal sex) where the pictures of the pelvic area of non-prostate-havers had erased the clitoris!

That article is a metaphor for the whole trans movement. And shows what it thinks of us non-prostate havers.

[–]ShieldMaiden 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Wow, I'm really late but, any chance this could be made into a google docs or something, so that we can all see it? I'm really interested in these kinds of blatant, undeniable examples of misogyny/expecting women, but not men, to acquiesce. It's awesome that you've been collecting stuff like that.