Youre not disputing shit. You’re just saying words don’t have real definitions. Which- if words have no definitions we can’t communicate to discuss anything. And we can’t understand each other. But go ahead and pat yourself on the back since for once you found a co-signer for your bullshit

It’s like you jumped to disputing definitions because you can’t back yourself up with facts. This is not a plus for you. It’s another deflection. I can’t believe you pointed this out like it made you look like you made a good point lol

“I don’t use your definition” is where you always go when you have no rebuttal (that and pointing out that we are somehow morally obligated to sacrifice ourselves for you). The reason I got so agitated on this post is because I asked you to come with facts. You couldn’t -shocker- so you resorted to pretending that definitions of words aren’t actually real because you cannot support your claims through facts. I saw this coming once I asked you to cite your claims and you admitted that you couldn’t.

I don’t even get what you thought pointing this out would accomplish. Yes, of course I noticed how when I asked you to discuss solely using facts you could not do so so you resorted to the tra trick of “wHat doEs WoRd MeaN aNywAy?”