you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

reconstruct their penis to look like a bionic fleshlight

Why can’t you just say neo-vaginas are not vaginas or post-op genitals don’t make someone a female? Saying things like this just feels like you are dehumanizing and degrading us for no reason. 😕

[–]SnowAssMan 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

An inside-out penis, designed for being a penis-sleeve is the most primitively androcentric view of a woman's birth canal ever. The procedure is glaringly misogynistic. It does not come anywhere close to being a vagina, neo, or otherwise. Thankfully most trans-women don't get the procedure done, but way too many do. People who do are being used as guinea pigs. It's a form of mutilation & it needs to be made illegal, along with circumcision & "normalising" surgeries performed on intersex people. I'm not going to be complicit in indirectly endorsing something horrible with the use of a pretty name. I'm not being paid to advertise it, so I'm not doing the work for free either.

If you define yourself based on a botched cosmetic procedure then that's really not anyone else's problem, mate. This is the internet. Grow a thicker skin, everyone else has to.

[–]peakingatthemomentTranssexual (natal male), HSTS 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I am not arguing I have a vagina, saying a vagina is just a hole for penis, or defining myself by the fact I’ve had bottom surgery.

I’m only saying that language isn’t necessary to make your point and makes GC people look bad.

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]Elly 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Removed for dragging down the discussion pyramid and generally bad acting.