""We should all be relieved" Tulsi on Mueller Report" by Non Mirage Truth Vision (2019-03-29)

submitted by JasonCarswell from youtube.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Sorry, it's extremely hard to tell when you are joking and when you aren't. You should check out how I style my articles, I think it's a more standard newspaper format that people can digest easily while still being accurate.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

d3rr added emojis. I should learn to use them more too. :)

What do you think of "~" for "by"?

Do you prefer the sources be left off?

And no dates?

Maybe I'm taking this too litteraly: "You are submitting a link. The key to a successful submission is interesting content and a descriptive title."

Would be great if you could add italics.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Like ideally (I think) the OP headline for instance would be:

"We should all be relieved" says Tulsi on Mueller report - Non Mirage Truth vision

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe leave the date off for things older than a month, all being relatively current?

But older stuff gets staler and really ought to be dated IMHO.

What do you think about notes and comments? I often add descriptors and try to keep the opinions for comment section, but sometimes feel it's worth putting up front.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah I would leave the date off if it's something that is recent. I think the default assumption is that the thing being posted is new (or at least new-ish). Your comments are fine, I often add my editorialization in the comments myself.