""We should all be relieved" Tulsi on Mueller Report" by Non Mirage Truth Vision (2019-03-29)

submitted by JasonCarswell from youtube.com

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]sawboss 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

What's this? A charismatic young Democrat presidential candidate who loves America and doesn't want to destroy it? And is a woman? And a veteran? WTF I can't believe it!

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

She's also a member of teh CFR, likely a controlled opposition.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No doubt.

And in a cult: Investigative Series on the Science of Identity Sect and Tulsi Gabbard /s/politics/comments/anu/investigative_series_on_the_science_of_identity

I still like her a lot but I still like Andrew Yang and Jill Stein better.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Just a style note, people typically do single quotes when quoting something inside double quotes. "'Like this' said magnora"

If it were me though, I'd lose the outer title quotes altogether because every title is kind of implied to be a quote of the original title, and less clutter the better, just my 2 cents.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Good to know about the inside quotes. Didn't know that. I do edit the title on rare occasions. ie recent Andrew Yang posts

So less clutter over clarity?

I'll think about it. I'd jump at the opportunity to drop them if I could italicize the title. I don't know if that's difficult or not, but it sure would help a lot. Bold might be nice on occasion too.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Ah yeah, less clutter leads to more clarity I think. If it were me, I'd lose the quotes altogether and replace the 'by' with a thick dash like — this. That's more typical headline styles. There's no italics or bold in headlines. It's kind of arbitrary though, but you are the only one who puts quotes around a headline title :P

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

But could you add italics? (and bold)

I'm the only one anal enough to be accurate.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'm the only one anal enough to be accurate.

Do you honestly think that's a true statement? It seems more you've invented your own style guide that you see as above the standard one... it's not more accurate, just more cluttered imo

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I was joking. I don't usually consider anal to be complimentary.

But I was trying to be accurate and making up for the lack of italics as best I could, and consistent. I also see a LOT of posts and I can't tell if they are the titles of the article or media or if it's commentary, or what.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Sorry, it's extremely hard to tell when you are joking and when you aren't. You should check out how I style my articles, I think it's a more standard newspaper format that people can digest easily while still being accurate.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

d3rr added emojis. I should learn to use them more too. :)

What do you think of "~" for "by"?

Do you prefer the sources be left off?

And no dates?

Maybe I'm taking this too litteraly: "You are submitting a link. The key to a successful submission is interesting content and a descriptive title."

Would be great if you could add italics.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Like ideally (I think) the OP headline for instance would be:

"We should all be relieved" says Tulsi on Mueller report - Non Mirage Truth vision

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Maybe leave the date off for things older than a month, all being relatively current?

But older stuff gets staler and really ought to be dated IMHO.

What do you think about notes and comments? I often add descriptors and try to keep the opinions for comment section, but sometimes feel it's worth putting up front.