Viruses DO. NOT. EXIST.

submitted by Alphix from zerohedge.com

all 23 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

So, what’s herpes? Or hepatitis? Or the flu? Or aids? Or pneumonia? Or any viral infection?

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

There are a number of possible causes of illness: poisons, cosmic rays and their interaction with the magnetic field, thoughts, feelings, fungi, molds, spores.

Possibly in the case of AIDS the cause is degenerate behavior? Either way, viruses don't fucking exist. They've been debunked multiple times and the only thing keeping that narrative alive are the endless repeaters who just keep voicing the propaganda they've received.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Ah. What about bacteria?

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What about them? They exist, they're involved in disease, obviously.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

So viruses don’t exist?

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nope. Made up in order to sell vaccines. Vaccines contain mercury, so they're a way to inject you with that and other poisons, so you become a life long customer for Big Pharma. Look at how much chronic and autoimmune illnesses, including autism have risen since the introduction of vaccines. We didn't even have those before.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

So, I believe I’m viruses. But I also believe vaccines give you autism.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, from the article I linked:

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology.

Why would you willingly choose to believe something that clearly DOES NOT EXIST? Tooth fairy? Santa Claus?

[–]zyxzevn 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Here is a video of viruses infecting plant cells.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

How sure are you?

It looks to me like exosomes expressing.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Exosomes are different. The replication system is also shown in the video.
Exosomes are what we see in the shedding of spike-proteins.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

What are you going on about. All so-called "viruses" you've ever seen in a video or photo ARE EXOSOMES because VIRUSES DO. NOT. EXIST. So any time you have a "tiny vesicle containing genetic information" that is going around inside or outside a cell, THAT'S AN EXOSOME. Not a virus. Not a red herring. Not a striped elephant.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The video explains how they made the viruses visible. Feel free to criticize that.

But your reply shows that you are stuck in some dogma.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sure, the way they "make the virus visible" is by poisoning and otherwise attacking the cell, which CREATES AN EXOSOME which is MADE TO WARN other cells of the nature of the attack it is subject to. Easy. They used to use Phenol Red which is a cellular poison, but obviously they used some other poison to color the exosomes. Because green, not red. Same difference though.

[–]zyxzevn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You made a far better argument.

But that is not how they do it in the video. They use a tracker that is visible under the microscope, that is planted in the virus itself.
The virus can be tracked traveling from cell to cell, via micro-tubules and one can see them start replicating processes.

The processes that you describe do not seem to appear in this video. Exosomes are ways of the cell to expose of garbage and toxins.
And sometimes there are spike-proteins and mRNA in those exosomes as well, so I can imagine the confusion.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A tracker in the exosome? OK then, same difference.

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Again, from the article I linked:

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology.

[–]dik 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Are you trolling? Let's see if one Saiditor is that stupid.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

go back to reddit you cunt

[–]dik 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

did I leave Reddit? Think... dipshit

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

https://www.adweek.com/files/2015_Jul/tucker_0.jpg

[–]dik 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

🤮

Your new username is Carlson-being-poisoned

[–]Alphix[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Read the article! THEY DON'T EXIST!

One quote:

Perhaps the primary evidence that the pathogenic viral theory is problematic is that no published scientific paper has ever shown that particles fulfilling the definition of viruses have been directly isolated and purified from any tissues or bodily fluids of any sick human or animal. Using the commonly accepted definition of “isolation”, which is the separation of one thing from all other things, there is general agreement that this has never been done in the history of virology.