The word greenhouse gas is no joke because from observation we can clearly infer that we live in a giant greenhouse.

False.

Greenhouses are fundamentally different form the so-called greenhouse gases.

Greenhouse walls are generally transparent to visible light, but opaque to infrared light.

Greenhouse walls absorbs and emits infrared inside the greenhouse.

The IR absorbion and emission helps the greenhouse retain of the radiant heat inside the greenhouse.

Greenhouse effects include broad spectrum infrared absorbion/emission.

CO2 is a gas. It is not a form of condensed matter. It has no lattice structure to support the absorbion/emission of a continuous spectrum.

Gases can only absorb/emit discreet EM frequencies (absorbion/emission bands).
This is an inherent physical property of all gases.

Fun fact: A lattice structure is a necessary to emit a continuous EM spectrum. The sun emits a continuous spectrum.

Therefore...

CO2 absorbs IR light in 3 discreet wavelengths (2.7, 4.3 and 15 micrometers (µM)).
CO2 is 100% transparent to all other IR frequencies.

Similarly narrow absorbion bands exist in each of the so-called "greenhouse gases", although the discreet bands will be unique for each type of gaseous molecule.

Note: The gaseous physics of discreet absorbion bands also applies to gaseous water vapor.

Clouds are formed of water or ice (not gaseous water vapor). Condensed matter.

Clouds also have a high albedo (% of light reflectivity) , and reflects back a significant % of the infrared light emitted from the ground surface. Cloud reflection is not the greenhouse effect.

Crucially liquid water is condensed matter and has a lattice structure, and can absorb/emit major regions of a continuous spectrum.

Clouds are formed of liquid water, or ice crystals.
The lattice structure of these materials allows for the infrared absorbion/emission (plus albedo reflectivity).

The greenhouse effect can be applied to cloudbcover, because the IR from the surface is being absorbed and emitted back to the surface.

The so-called greenhouse gases do not have the necessary physical properties to produce the greenhouse effect.

Your argumentation goes like this: Even though we have seen the ball falling down one million times it may be going up to the sky next time we let it loose. Of course it could but where is the reason here ?

No. My argument is very different.

My argument is man made "global warming" from so-called greenhouse gases is scientific fraud on a fundamental level.

Broad spectrum absorbion/emission can only occur in greenhouse trace gases CO2 is roughly ~0.04% of the atmosphere.

00.04% is commonly rounding error.

It's physically impossible for a gas to behave this way.

It's a hoax.

There isn't even one climate model for my region that says otherwise.

This is precisely the point I'm making.

You probably won't ever see a "climate model" that will ever suggest global warming is fake, because the models are fake.

It shouldn't be that difficult to factor the narrow absorbion rates if CO2 into their models.

It's basic physics.

Basic physics is often made to appear complex when it produces the wrong answer.

The climate modeler's job depends on the global warming hoax industry.

Anyone who makes legit models that accurately represent the basics of CO2 absorbion physics won't find work in the hoax industry.

Let me know if your interested in evidence that substantiates my position.

I won't waste your time if you're not ready.

I suspect you have the background to understand the technical details.

The physics is fairly straight forward.

You could probably understand the truth of the global warming hoax.

However...

I won't waste your time if you're not ready.