There is Methane also.

Also a gas. The exact same principal applies.

All the further provable arguments i brought you didn't even touch.

I didn't address any of your other points, because the idea of "greenhouse gases" has been fundamentally refuted.

Global warming is predicated on the notion that excess gaseous carbon molecules in the air cause increases in climate temp. .

This idea is easily debunked based on freshman level chemistry/physics.

If there is excess volaitility in the weather, then you need to be look into another influencing factor to identify the cause.

Trace amounts of so-called "Greenhouse gases" cannot be the culprit.

A CO2 increase from 00.035% to 00.041% in over 120 years is absurd!

That's an increase of 6 : 100,000 molecules! With only 3 absorbion bands?

Every other frequency of light passed through with perfect clarity, which is functionally +99.9% of IR frequencies.
It's absurd on it's face, but it never gets discussed.

EM absorbion in gases doesn't physically behave this way. Period.

The IPCC will be including solar forcing in their 2022 models. The idea that the primary source for the energy was conveniently omitted from their models is laughable.

Just another example of blatant scientific fraud.

Keep in mind that I get where you're coming from. I was fooled for decades.

The good news is it's a hoax.
The bad news is the motivation for the hoax is much worse than the climate change threat (for mankind).

I'm sure you don't like what I'm saying, but I didn't pick the physical nature of the universe.

Feel free to let me know if you've found any errors in my assessment of the gas physics.

I have no doubt you understand exactly what I am pointing out, and how these details fundamentally undermine the global warming narrative.

What I'm saying is true, which means what they are claiming is not.