you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]WetAssPussy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Then stop forcing women to accept

AGAIN - This is obviously the opposite of what I note. How may ways must I write that we should NOT control the sexual preferences of others? You cannot legislate morality. Live and let live.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

The destruction of all women's rights and forcing people to participate in fake gender rituals isn't control? lol.

[–]WetAssPussy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Your focus in this thread is on the destruction and control of women's rights. You're also against abortions of any kind, I suspect. I'm obviously the opposite.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

LOL. So the only argument you have left is a (wrong) unrelated opinion you're projecting on to me.

[–]WetAssPussy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No - the opposite.

You're accusing me of being various people or things I am not, while you try to argue that you want to control the rights of women and gays. Whereas I'm proving that you are wrong on all accounts.

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I'm arguing in favour of retaining legal rights of women and homosexuals. You want to ERASE them.

[–]WetAssPussy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Nope - you want to restrict their rights

[–]xoenix 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What's a woman?