Thanks for the info - but as usual - these far right people are focusing on the efforts of just a few people and generalizing those actions to the broader context of 400 million people. It just doesn't work. Of course there are influencers who've tried to promote social change. They were not as effective as we're sometimes led to believe by highly biased sources. For what it's worth, I hear arguments like this often from an older relative of mine, who will use one example to expand that circumstance to the public in general. It's crazy. Sure, the Pritzkers were somewhat influential, but it's easy to show that their incfluence was quite limited. Whenever you see these one-example-fits-all analogies, they're always missing one general factor: the diversity of human agency.