you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]RedditButt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To summarily dismiss something because "all sources that don't agree with my statement must be bad" is just a poisoning the well type of argument.

If there's any part of a wikipedia article you feel is not accurate or biased, you can participate in the talk page and in editing of the article as well. The history of those are publicly available, too.

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To summarily dismiss something because "all sources that don't agree with my statement must be bad" is just a poisoning the well type of argument.

Except I literally never said that and you're strawmanning me over some TDS nonsense. All of Wikipedia sucks. It's edited by people with a bias and agenda and gatekept by those same people that don't allow edits that go against their viewpoints. It's no more credible as a resource than Reddit or CNN. They're mostly just opinions. Like I said, I don't really care enough about this to keep arguing about it. I think you just really hate Donald Trump, which is ironic cause you're giving him more attention this way, when I don't even really care about this.