Why are americans such bad people?

submitted by elonmusk7 from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I'm like Trump: An honest asshole. It's the dishonest and phony ones you gotta watch out for.

[–]RedditButt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_or_misleading_statements_by_Donald_Trump

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Wikipedia is anything but a valid or unbiased source. Regardless, my comment wasn't that serious.

[–]RedditButt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Wikipedia is not a source. It's an information article written from a bibliography of sources that are cited at the bottom.

Regardless, there are over 30,000 documented lies that trump has told, so to call him honest in any capacity is laughable.

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah, and the sources cited at the bottom usually aren't valid, unbiased, well-researched, or credible. So Wikipedia provides summary articles of biased and often inaccurate or false information, which was my main point. And I'm not even trying to defend Trump here; you're just taking one comment way too seriously.

[–]RedditButt 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

To summarily dismiss something because "all sources that don't agree with my statement must be bad" is just a poisoning the well type of argument.

If there's any part of a wikipedia article you feel is not accurate or biased, you can participate in the talk page and in editing of the article as well. The history of those are publicly available, too.

[–]Mcheetah 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

To summarily dismiss something because "all sources that don't agree with my statement must be bad" is just a poisoning the well type of argument.

Except I literally never said that and you're strawmanning me over some TDS nonsense. All of Wikipedia sucks. It's edited by people with a bias and agenda and gatekept by those same people that don't allow edits that go against their viewpoints. It's no more credible as a resource than Reddit or CNN. They're mostly just opinions. Like I said, I don't really care enough about this to keep arguing about it. I think you just really hate Donald Trump, which is ironic cause you're giving him more attention this way, when I don't even really care about this.