Would truecels be satisfied with free, effortless state-mandated sex, or would the pre-existing beaveroids need to be punished? Would a normie want revenge for being deprived of intimacy for the first 25 years of his life?

submitted by homosexual_blacklist from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted]  (1 child)

[removed]

    [–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Firstly, you start on a false premise: I don't think a girl touching you on the arm means anything at all. You obviously do, and it's... Interesting that this is your standard... But it's not what I talked about.

    Yes, you would prove yourself a better man by having sex with a willing partner. In one of these scenarios you have shown that you're attractive, intelligent and charismatic enough for a woman to consider you worth having sex with. In the other, you're just the person she's being forced to fuck that day to avoid gaol time. Very straight forward, not hard to understand, I think.

    If you're having trouble understanding why women gatekeeping sex and permitting you to pass that test isn't comparable to women being forced to have sex with you, here's an analogy:

    You're in a boxing match. You face 10 different opponents and beat them all. You are the best boxer! You are given the trophy.
    You're in a boxing match. Your 10 opponents are threatened by the mob to throw the fight. It doesn't matter how good you are. You still get a trophy.

    In one of those scenarios, I can tell you that the boxer is a good boxer. In the other, he just got a trophy.