Proposed solution(s) to an on-going issue.

submitted by Tom_Bombadil from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Mnemonic 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I like the approach, but all these examples seem to fail the pyramid.

Especially the 3rd one, the Vaccine depopulation. I've only done history (extra) in High-school, but Look up the Spanish-flu and you have the answer for a depopulation scheme...

And to take this an an example, what is truth, I highly doubt any of the saiditers is somewhere near and virologist (which vaccines are against) and even if a saiditer is a virologist... how to prove this without doxxing itself and showing somekind of 'shoe on head' photo with credentials within a 30-minute time range?

I'm saying this because, as and IT-person and having read a lot of studies (8 in my study and some unaccounted for in spare time) it takes (especially in STEM-studies) a lot of self study to even begin reading them. I can't imagine the specialties you should have read upon in virology...

I would (though it would be very cumbersome) propose to have the claims (upon discrediting some research) explained.

Example:

MSM: claims Mnemonic is a dick

Me: Starts a submittion by saying, MSM article is wrong it is [explaining in my words their claim (so people know what you think)] {aka Mnemonic is a dick}.

But! This is wrong Mnemonic is not a dick because [link to scientific study (and then explaining in my words what that article says)]

This way people can criticize the article AND my 'explanation' I got from the article. (because I could have read it wrong, got some terminology wrong, something else wrong).

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

This is probably the most involved of the group, as science has been hijacked for this one. Climate change has been hijacked similarly, but with a bit more obvious weaknesses.

Also, this one was included intentionally as it is an issue that many here disagree with.

I accept your challenge.

Unfortunately, dealing with the shills is a more pressing issue.

Would you be surprised to learn that certain NGOs are being sued, because sterilization drugs were found in their vaccines??? Would that pique your interest?

Also, don't get the flu shot, until I can get into the specifics. ;-)

[–]Mnemonic 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Would you be surprised to learn that certain NGOs are being sued, because sterilization drugs were found in their vaccines??? Would that pique your interest?

No (not surprised) and Yes (would probably get my interest) and that would suggest these sterilization vaccines are being distributed in Africa. And again, please who les proofs.

Though usually it's the science behind vaccinations that's being questioned or the engineering of the western distributed vaccines (why lead/mercury usage in them?) and I've never seen those studies that say the mercury/lead is bad in those concentrations.

BUT

If you posted an article and your conclusion (which may well be these accusations) I could better make up my mind, as would everybody else. I used it as an example because I only know Extreme Christians that use religion as counterargument to vaccination.

[–]Tom_Bombadil[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

K. Dr computer.

We'll address this later.