Why do I have to block one or more new "users" every day so I don't have to see these stupid ass bone conducting headphone posts?

submitted by IkeConn from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The price of civility as well as the price of liberty in a freedom-of-speech-sense are both extremely high, especially when this platform suffers from some reddit-fallout then and again.

My first idea also was to automatize this, but then we'll either could get what Elon Musk right now is failing (what else can he do, actually ?) at or another Conde-Nast-"troll and shill"-shithole.

I like it the way it is, even though I support your point of "tipping the scales" in the other direction.

I get your point, don't get me wrong.

But there also is some nifty theory (I actually forgot right now) trying to explain the bolts and nuts why any human society dipping into three digits of members seemingly needs either some form of administration or rather resilient individuals.

[–]ceck 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

But there also is some nifty theory (I actually forgot right now) trying to explain the bolts and nuts why any human society dipping into three digits of members seemingly needs either some form of administration or rather resilient individuals.

You might be thinking of the "Dunbar number" theory of tribes, which claims that proto-humans evolved to live in groups of one hundred to one-hundred-fifty members.

https://www.bbc.com/future/article/20191001-dunbars-number-why-we-can-only-maintain-150-relationships

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunbar's_number