What's your opinion about the NOMAP community (Non-offending minor attracted person)? Not to confuse with the MAP community.

submitted by bucetao6969 from self.AskSaidIt

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

This is how the trans mafia started 20 years ago. “We just want to be left alone!”

They’re just taking the costumes off now.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Trans mafia is a bit more intricate...

They followed off gay rights, whereas the gays left others alone, the TQ+ wants to indoctrinate children to normalize their lifestyle.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

My point is that they’re the same people. Trans was a means to an end.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I don't disaggre that MAP normalization could lead to the trans equivalent of today.

However I do think a lot of good people are behind it with the goal of reducing child endargement. I aggre with the notion that less marginalization of pedos could mean less pedos feeling shamed of getting help, thus making them way less likely to act on their urges.

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You’re not picking up what I’m putting down. Guessing your either a bot or a lefty.

[–]bucetao6969[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Anyone who disaggres with you is a bot or a lefty? I think you're the bot here...

[–]TitsAndWhiskey 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No, not at all. Anyone who struggles to maintain a grasp of the conversation tends to be a bot or a lefty.