you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Could war actually be a hidden trait of homosexuality that some feel they can't openly express in modern cities and therefore hide behind a disguise of traits you believe unlikely to be suited for war?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Wouldn't this just fail to explain women also engaging in homesexual behavior while at home during war?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Aren't you merely suggesting a void in collection of female statistics where scientists prefer to measure ding dongs than enquire about eating fur burger?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Don't said scientists just prefer to dress up their ding dongs in little suits and/or wipe their bums with www.readthesequences.com while drinking champagne?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Aren't you actually referring to climate scientists who rake in unlimited corruption money for bias government sponsored nothingness studies?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Isn't action-based science really just quantified virtue? Wouldn't we otherwise have to rely on fascism to measure and sort virtuous causes?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Aren't you being loose with the term action based science, since most climate studies conclude that the best course of action is inaction, by ceasing activity which upsets their mustache combs and smashes monocles?