you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

i seem to remember offering my hand to assist in securing down this forum, i made the offer to you, d3rr, but you were snippy and you told me that you had that sht under wraps..

yeah, i see, you obviously have that sht under control, now dont you?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

What, tech help? I'm down. The heat is off now that no one is here, but I'd still be interested in any improvements that can be made. I can't remember the specific conversation that we had but some offers for help have been strange.

[–]specialsauces 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

you are going to need to be creative to make this site work..

i keep thinking that the moderation process is slightly broken and not working very well..

what if, instead of having individual moderators over each sub, what if you had a panel of mods that oversee the entire site.. and maybe they remain silent, a bit like the supreme court, for example..

i dont know..

[–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

How about having a number of admins that don't post much, but that keep spam and bots out, and investigate users that use disruptive spam to drive conversations to promote their own darknet websites, then have lower-level sub based mods who keep those places working, with recourse for users to appeal to the (silent) admin layer when the sub mods misbehave?

Sounds like a fantastic model.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[removed]

    [–]TheAmeliaManiac 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    i thought you were 50%. why would you be 25%, there's no need for you to create 10% of the content.