Leftists of Saidit: what is the list of all the topics you feel you can not speak freely on?

submitted by Chipit from (self.AskSaidIt)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Questionable 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (27 children)

"Negative. It's mainstream ideology."

No it's not. Nor does being 'mainstream' validate it in any way. Gender identity is a talking point created by globalists to foster division amongst the people. Where as the liberals now preside in the GOP because they have been ostracized by the DNC.

You should take a page from this guys book:

"Please, leftists only and sympathetic voices in this thread. This isn't a pile-on. Go to the any other thread for that."

He sounds extremely rational. He also reads like a person who is not typing from his phone, chasing the endorphin rush of social media.

hint. hint.

[–]Chipit[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (24 children)

It's in a professional development course. Supposed to be education, but instead is hardcore political indoctrination of extreme views.

Cite evidence otherwise.

[–]Questionable 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

Why would I cite evidence otherwise? It is indoctrination of fascism meant to destroy America for foreign interests.

Any true liberal or Democrat should be repulsed by this.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It is indoctrination of fascism meant to destroy America for foreign interests.

"Fascism" isn't just whatever you dislike.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Correct. And I meant fascist. As in the socialist party in the streets that are using the same tactics to destabilized our country, as did the national socialists party of Germany used.

Do I explicitly need to state this every time I use this term?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The Antifas in the street are using the same tactics as the Antifa of the 1930s, the terror wing of the Stalinist KPD. The SA only arose as a means for ordinary people to defend against Antifa and RFKB terrorists. Fascism is the healthy mass response of the people against civilizational decline and foreign exploitation. It is the imposition of order following the failure of liberalism. How can it be a foreign effort to destroy a nation, when it 1. arises spontaneously and 2. makes a nation strong?

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

How can it be a foreign effort to destroy a nation, when it 1. arises spontaneously and 2. makes a nation strong?

Since you are completely wrong about every aspect of what is taking place. It is clearly the fault of a broken Hot Tub Time Machine!

Look, there is no way for me to explain to you, how completely fucked up in the head you are. There have been cults that have committed mass suicide that were less delusional than you are.

[–]bobbobbybob 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (16 children)

Any true liberal

That is called the 'no true scotsman' logical fallacy.

[–]wecandobetter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're right, but liberal is not a party affiliation strictly speaking. It's a philosophy, and those that don't follow it are not liberal.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

as I said, no true scotsman. Acknowledging the fallacy does not negate it.

You say that any true liberal would be repulsed, yet many of my liberal friends call it liberalism. What we see is an extension of progressive liberal policy to its natural conclusion. Any true intelligent person therefore has to understand that the previous applicable 'liberal' ideals that they espoused do not actually function when tested against the real world, and should re-assess their stance.

Some of the challenges that liberalism faced and failed are:

Gender ideology. Where philosophy attempts to override reality. Liberalism led to nonsense of 'assigned at birth'

Islam. Where tolerance meets totalitarian genocidal mania. Liberalism fails to prevent takeover by non-secular extremism.

Democracy: Where concepts of liberalism face the hard truth that it is not the golden endpoint of social evolution and generations of propaganda and indoctrination has not led to an united populace. Liberalism then turns to rejection of dissenting democratic voices, which is why cities are burning.

Liberalism failed, and what we see on the left IS failed, true, liberalism.

If you don't agree with it, then you have rejected the principles of liberalism itself, and should better put your time to building a new philosophy like the rest of us are.

[–]wecandobetter 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Great reply, and excellent points.

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

I could change it to the majority of liberals are repulsed by this. Though I wont.

Transgenderism isn't being pushed in good faith, and I won't address it as a part of a belief system.

[–]bobbobbybob 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

and I won't address it as a part of a belief system.

putting your head in the sand does not change reality.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Look. I don't pander to idiots. So if you're not going to say anything that wasn't stolen out of a "debate for dummies" CliffsNotes.

Fuck off.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

to quote you:

I'm not 100% certain of the rules around here. But this seems like a really bad idea on your part.

If your response to being called out for using logical fallacies is to reject people who call out your logical fallacies for fallacious reasons, then you really are a giant waste of space.

[–]Questionable 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

You know what you are doing. Keep it up, you'll be banned soon enough.

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

you really don't have much to bring to the table, do you?

[–]bobbobbybob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The OP is the person you are telling to take a page from OPs book, you know

[–]Questionable 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes. That's the joke.