you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Aureus 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

/u/magnora7 should make one quick before someone more biased against SaidIt does.

[–]magnora7 13 insightful - 1 fun13 insightful - 0 fun14 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Saidit is mentioned on the wiki article for reddit I think. But the requirement to have a wiki article is to have a "significant article mention" so basically a MSM source needs to mention saidit at some point, which hasn't really happened yet, except on medium.com. We're close, but I don't think we yet quality, but maybe if someone tries again we can get one established

[–]Aureus 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But the requirement to have a wiki article is to have a "significant article mention" so basically a MSM source needs to mention saidit at some point

I feel like this cause some serious bias issues for Wikipedia...

[–]Robin 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

For sure. It means that whoever controls corporate media can control wikipedia. https://www.wikispooks.com/wiki/WP/C