AltBase Update by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes - hoping to get a new server back online over the next couple days

AltBase Update by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]ballsack23 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any updates?

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

u/fuckkikes is attacking

Nice site! by DoyleTokarz in AltBase

[–]DoyleTokarz[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Nice to see it back up. The downloadable issue is understandable.

AltBase Update by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for checking it out. Its back up now

Nice site! by DoyleTokarz in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks for checking it out. Its back up now

A download feature is something that has been requested before. I'm not exactly sure how this would work, since downloading all the files linked in AltBase I estimate would be well over 1GB, and a lot of the links are indirect (e.g., "Psychology Paper 1" links to the abstract, but you'd have to click the 'download' button on the site to get the paper). I could potentially make the database itself downloadable - but it would be useless to people without the appropriate software to read/use it. I'd also prefer not to do that since it could create vulnerabilities for the site

AltBase Update by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]jimbolia 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I just learned about this project. I'm excited to check it out when it's back up!

Overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics. Criminal and Police Activity in New York City by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]Tiwaking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The stats for Asian/Pacific Islander's makes me sad. Their parents needed to beat them more when they were kids.

Overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics. Criminal and Police Activity in New York City by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]IkeConn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

If the perps are nigras and hispanics it's not like you can change their race to fit your preferred metrics.

Overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics. Criminal and Police Activity in New York City by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]Blame07[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

2017

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year-end-2017-enforcement-report.pdf

Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Quote:

The race/ethnicity of known murder and non-negligent manslaughter suspects mirrors the victim population, with Black (61.7%) and Hispanic (27.0%) suspects representing the majority of suspects. White suspects accounted for (7.7%) of all murder and non-negligent manslaughter suspects, while there were no Asian or Pacific Islander murder and non-negligent manslaughter suspects (3.6%).

The Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrest population is similarly distributed. Black arrestees (54.8%) and Hispanic arrestees (32.2%) account for the majority of Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrestees while White arrestees (6.9%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (5.4%) arrestees account for the remaining portions of the Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter arrest population.

Rape

Quote:

Rape suspects are most often black (49.5%) or Hispanic (33.4%). White suspects account for (11.2%) of all rape suspects, while Asian/Pacific Islanders account for (5.3%) of known rape suspects.

Rape arrestees are most frequently black (47.9%) and Hispanic (38.2%). White (8.3%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (5.6%) arrestees account for the remainder of the rape arrestee population.

Overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics. Criminal and Police Activity in New York City by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]Blame07[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

2018

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year-end-2018-enforcement-report.pdf

Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Quote:

The race/ethnicity of known murder and non-negligent manslaughter suspects mirrors the victim population, with the majority of suspects being Black (61.9%) and Hispanic (31.0%). White Whites (5.4%) of all murder and nonnegligent manslaughter suspects, while Asian/Pacific Islanders account for (1.7%) of known murder and nonnegligent manslaughter suspects. nonnegligent manslaughter

The population arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter has a similar distribution. Black (60.1%) and Hispanic (33.4%) arrestees account for the majority of those arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter, while Whites (4.6%) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (1.5%) account for the majority of those arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. Whites (4.6%) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (1.5%), while Whites (4.6%) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (1.5%) account for the remainder of the population arrested for murder and manslaughter of the population arrested for murder and manslaughter.

Rape

Quote:

Rape suspects are most often black (48.6%) or Hispanic (32.8%). White suspects account for (11.8%) of all rape suspects, while Asian/Pacific Islanders account for (6.5%) of known rape suspects.

Those arrested for rape are most often black (43.3%) and Hispanic (42.4%). White (7.2%) and Asian/Pacific Islander (6.6%) arrestees account for the remainder of the rape arrestee population.

Overrepresentation of blacks and Hispanics. Criminal and Police Activity in New York City by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]Blame07[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

2019

https://www1.nyc.gov/assets/nypd/downloads/pdf/analysis_and_planning/year-end-2019-enforcement-report.pdf

Murder and non-negligent manslaughter

Quote:

The race/ethnicity of known Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter suspects mirrors the victim population with Black (62.4%) and Hispanic (30.8%) suspects accounting for the majority of suspects. Asian/Pacific Islander suspects account for (3.8%) of all Murder and Non-Negligent Manslaughter suspects while Whites accounted for (3.0%) of the known Murder and NonNegligent Manslaughter suspects

The homicide arrestee population is similarly distributed. Black (58.0%) and Hispanic (35.2%) arrestees account for the majority of those arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. while Whites (3.3%) and Asians/Pacific Islanders (3.0%) account for the remainder of the population arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter. of the population arrested for murder and non-negligent manslaughter.

Rape

Quote:

Rape suspects are most often black (46.5%) or Hispanic (34.8%). White suspects account for (10.8%) of all rape suspects, while Asian/Pacific Islanders account for (7.3%) of known rape suspects. Rape arrestees are most often Hispanic (45.4%) and Black (40.7%). Asian/Pacific Islander (7.0%) and White (6.7%) arrestees account for the remainder of the rape arrestee population.

I have a problem registering by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah, no problem. Looks like you logged in fine and also added a source, so that's great

A corresponding claim you could add is something like "Many so-called "fact-checkers" are funded by Soros / OpenSociety Foundations". Then this Claim/Source would show up in ClaimView, like the others. I went ahead and did that (C1470) as an example. You can also add another claim for this source or edit the one I already made.

Ideally each of your listed links in your post would also be submitted as individual sources, but there is no reason why you can't also use it this way. Thanks for contributing, let me know if you have any other issues/questions

I have a problem registering by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]Blame07[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you, I registered several times, my current account is Felio0

I have a problem registering by Blame07 in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hey

That's not exactly the error I would expect you to see - but there is currently a bug I know of that basically causes new users to be auto-banned upon account creation (yeah lol). Long story short its just something I missed when I coded that feature a few months ago and I have to manually to un-ban new users. It isn't hard, and I just did that, so check to see if your access works now.

We had four new users sign up in the last two days, which is unusually high (maybe people creating multiple accounts to try and get around the account creation issue). Let me know either way if your access does/doesn't work. I plan to patch this in the next update.

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes it has a thriving nationalist community

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These days i dont debate much so i haven't used it frequently

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice! That works, thanks. Ever get to use it much?

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've thought about getting one.

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

yes my account got banned, now i am mostly active on telegram

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks, I really appreciate it. I noticed your username was gone from Discord last I saw so I assume you had been banned. Question: Do you still link to the wordpress page or do you link directly to the website itself?

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thank you for a reply, i just want to let you know i am still making redpill threads on /pol/ where i advertise your website, discord now purges even small private communities so i wont be much active there anymore.

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I mostly agree with what you say, but I think this discussion is a bit overly-technical. For most fields ("columns", yes). I just used varchar for most of them and might amend them later or add more columns. For now, it's just a test/sandbox data set. The immediate goal is just to get a starting data set for these three dimensions (person/institution/list) and then flesh out what we really need from there. Things like birth or death date don't practically matter for how we want to use the data.

The starting data set is basically done, which I'm relieved to say, since it took me a lot longer than expected. Fun facts: There are no more than 7,376 individuals in VDR's list (some of which are duplicates or nicknames and need to be reviewed) and there are 23,258 discrete individual-institution relationships. The average person appears three times, and the person with the most appearances is Henry Kissinger, at 112 (plus more, once we count the "Henry K." s discretely, as these could also refer to Henry Kravis or Henry Kaufman, who appear 20 and 2 times, respectfully) I already counted all Jews with an appearance over 2 times, imperfectly, but I estimate that Jews account for about 22% of the overall representation of the 23,258. Researching some of these individuals has led to some interesting discoveries - for instance, did you know that Sumner Shapiro, Rear Admiral in the US Navy (a rare case, Jews almost never appear in US military positions), was instrumental in getting Israeli spy Jonathan Pollard's security clearance? Although he later stated

"We work so hard to establish ourselves and to get where we are, and to have somebody screw it up... and then to have Jewish organizations line up behind this guy and try to make him out a hero of the Jewish people, it bothers the hell out of me".

Really interesting stuff. Wish I could catalog everything at once

There are a few glaring shortcomings of VDR's list. The first is that there is an almost complete lack of interest in the media industry, which you think would be of paramount importance in assessing who is behind manufacturing the false and obviously biased narratives we see every day, and consequently why the population behaves like it does. Especially if your focus is on "conspiracy research" and bias against things about elites getting exposed, journalists assassinated, etc. Ofc, the basic answer to "who owns the media" is "Jews" (60-80%), and VDR has a very ant-anti-semitic slant so this aligns to his complete disavowal of "holocaust denial" and his very bad justifications (practically dogwhistling) for not investigating it:

Ever met a Nazi or Holocaust denier in real life? Most haven't, but online, they're everywhere. Ignore the many discussions about concentration camp Auschwitz. Instead, read about Babi Yar and the eastern European extermination camps of the Nazis and the Ustasa, or look up the visual evidence. You'll get the point.

Jew-hating - in its "deniable" form or not - is super-effective at pushing ordinary people out of any conspiracy discussions and at forcing censorship measures. Thus, like an ever-spreading virus, it remains

I half-ways agree with the sentiment, but ultimately the truth just is what it is. I think VDR is on-the-level and not a Jewish shill, but sometimes he begs the question.

As of now, most all of the data is in the database and I'm trying to figure out how to present and expose it. I'm going to add more people that aren't just in VDR's list, notably from CoC, Dissident-Right circles, and the media. To start, I'll probably create new pages that have no links to them in the existing UI, but expose them here. This way, interested people who come here will have the link can check them out and give feedback, but they wouldn't otherwise be accessible to casual lurkers.

Much more I could write about a lot of stuff, but I wanted to give a general update. Very much appreciate your interest.

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey

Sorry, I don't log in very often anymore unless I see activity on the sub (the captcha is a pain via VPN for me now) but basically only active here, though I check the discord from time to time. This post was the latest update, I detailed a little bit about my new push to get an individuals/institutions dimension to AltBase, which I have been working on a lot and plan to release kind of soon (I'm almost done with the starting data set but haven't figured out exactly how the pages will work). AltBase is also getting more queries and more users signing up, so that's cool. Still not a lot of content being added by these users though, so hopefully that changes.

Good to hear from you, hope all is well

AltBase is down by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey how are you? On what platform you are the most active right now?

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]SamiAlHayid 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think I can follow this, though I haven't looked at a SQL database in years and will have to look at and re-use most of what I did in the past when I do some web design stuff in future.

If I had the time, I was thinking of drawing UML diagrams to figure out how I'd attempt such a task myself. But, for starters, I cannot even find a non-commercial program that does this.

Institutions, Individuals and Lists definitely seem like they should be separate tables within the database.

I think what you mean by 'field' is what I know as 'column'. Yes, each individual, institution and list would be one row. The first column would be a primary key (int), and then the rest of the columns would mostly be varchar. Of course, varchar seems like the lazy option and is more 'abusable'. It might, for example, make sense to make birth date/death date three ints ('day' would have a drop down box from 1-31, 'month' would have a drop down box from 1-12, 'year' would have a drop down box, rather than one varchar, since it lowers the chance of incorrect entries). No one can add an obviously unwanted/incorrect date like '99 99 9999' into the database that way.

I think the 'linking' tables sounds correct, because entries like 'Funder', 'Father', etc. would often be blank if they were to be added to the main Individuals table. So I think there would be a lot of NULL entries and it would also clutter the page for the addition of these to the database with various text boxes, etc. that will in most cases be unused. For example, if one was to add 'Noel Ignatiev', whoever his father was is likely of no consequence, will have no AltBase article, and may not even be public knowledge. Therefore, one would leave it empty and the database would have plenty of these empty cells in there. And this is probably the case for the vast majority of individuals. The linkages really need to be on a separate table, and the linkages added separately to the individuals themselves. Then, the database will not have as many empty cells in there.

I don't have any remarks on the rest, but it sounds to me like you are on the right track.

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think maybe explaining how the data will work might help you visualize.

Basically, "Instutions", "Individuals", and "Lists" are their own tables, and there will be different fields within those tables (e.g., the Individuals table will have fields like "name", "birth date", "death date", "ethnicity", etc.) Same thing with the Institutions table - "institution-type" (e.g., "Corporation", "Foundation", "NGO", etc.)

The Institutions, Individuals, and Lists tables will all have corresponding tables that "link" them to the others - e.g. 'individuals-institutions', 'individuals-individuals', 'individuals-lists', and 'institutions-lists'. Within each of these linking tables there will be a column or two that specifies what the relationship is. For instance, in the 'individuals-individuals' table, there will be a field like "relationship" in which you would tie Individual "Les Wexner" to Individual "Jeffrey Epstein" and say "Funder". That same field between George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush would be populated with "Father" or "Son". In the 'individuals-institutions' table, you would tie "Andrew Jassy" to institution "Amazon" and the "title" field would be "CEO". There might also be a "year_start" and "year_end" field in that table. Some fields would also be optional, depending on the table. For instance, in the table 'individuals-lists' Individual "Les Wexner" would be assigned to the List-item "Zionists" - and there probably doesnt need to be a lot of other fields or substantiating information for that. But there could be more, if we wanted them. Individuals, Institutions, and Lists will each have their own dedicated "view" (like ClaimView and ImageView works now) and the relationships to those things will appear like #tags do now - except ones that you can click on and navigate, so you can get more info on that person/institution/list (depending on which view you're in).

Actually, I'm not sure how helpful that is lol. Basically, I intend to satisfy the desired requirements you lay out here. The database tables might seem complicated, but they aren't actually, and, as a normal user, this won't be apparent in a (hopefully intuitive) UI. I don't know exactly how the pages will work yet, but, to start, individual items probably won't have their own dedicated pages (unique URLs). Instead, they would need to be searched for in the database (just as images and claims do not have thier own "page" right now.) That is to say, there will not be a static url for each entry (contrast to wikipedia, that does have a URL for each entry). I recognize that is a drawback, but I am not sure what else to do in lieu of not creating literally thousands of individual pages for the entries I am adding.

As usual, this has turned out to be a lot more work than I originally expected. Van Der Reijden has so many different formats and ways of referring to the same person. Some duplicates and misspellings, too. For instance, Zbigniew Brzezinski has like five different ways he is referred to - e.g. "Zbignieuw Brzezinski", "Zbig B.", "Zbig", etc. Also VDR will inconsistently put a title in front of a name (e.g. "Dr.", "Baron", "General"), and sometimes not. This isn't really an issue for people that "I know" but there are literally thousands of people in his list I have never heard of. So its very hard to parse through the list in a programmatic way, which means a lot of manual work (and don't even get me started on the wikipedia scraping).

Anyways, once I have a good list of discrete individuals, then I will have a super-solid starting dataset. I'm looking forward to getting there and also having a useful web UI to show all of it.

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]SamiAlHayid 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sounds great. Yeah, I think there needs to be a distinction at the very least between individual and collectivity. For example, the former has a birth date whereas the latter has a foundation date. I don't think one is reducible to the other. Because concepts, ideas, theories, etc. can only come from individuals and/or collectivities (this does raise a question about concepts, ideas and theories whose founders are unknown, but most of these long predate modernity and are unlikely to warrant pages) they seem to me to be reducible to those two page types (e.g. 'Freudian-Marxism' would best be a section of 'Frankfurt School' and not as a section of 'Karl Marx', 'Sigmund Freud', 'Theodor Adorno', etc., though those pages would have links to 'Frankfurt School'; ideally, going right down to the 'Freudian-Marxism' section without having to manually scroll).

There then at very least needs to be a distinction between lists and the other two. For example, a hypothetical page about 'Antifa' really needs to be a list of organizations pages, e.g. 'Rose Bay Antifa', 'Portland Antifa', and probably has no content other than those hyperlinks.

This would help at the very least to reduce pages that:

  • Have too much data on the page because they are trying to address too wide a scope. For example, if I want to read 'Rose Bay Antifa' but it is a section on a bloated 'Antifa chapters' page, I would have to load the 'Portland Antifa' content as well.

  • Force people to scroll more than otherwise. I also do not want to scroll past the 'Portland Antifa' content if I only want to read 'Rose Bay Antifa'.

Hopefully it will take the shape of a large number of specific pages rather than a lesser number of more general pages.

Events might be a tough one, though, because I don't think they are reducible to these three categories. Furthermore, many events are happening which are totally unreported on. And I'm sure someone will want the functionality to document, for example, Antifa or BLM protests that occurred on a particular date, and indeed these are practically all unreported on and therefore 'hidden' from the public, even though they are on video (e.g. riotarchive.com, YouTube channels like 'Adapt Ahead') and so facts can be gathered on them. However, multiple organizations are involved and it would lead to a large amount of content duplication if the event information was copied onto the pages of all organizations known to be involved.

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any progress made on 'individuals and institutions' yet?

Yes. I have some idea of how this will look like and be architected and am already started on the dataset. Basically, individuals, organizations, and "lists" will be their own records. Individuals will be tagged to organizations and lists with a supporting source.

The starting dataset is the real challenge. I've decided ISGP's list of 1500 NGOs is a good place to start. The list has over 8k individuals and 1.7k institutions of interest, and I trust the reporting as accurate. Once I've parsed through the list there, I'll have a really good starting data set. I also intend to add a few other individuals and orgs that aren't included (hopefully with a digital copy of CoC, but I don't know of one that exists atm)

Ability to hyperlink text.

Yes. One of the big issues I will have to solve for is creating a wiki-style bio page (basically) for individuals, institutions, and lists (e.g. "Journolist", "Frankfurt School", etc.). I haven't tried anything like that before. But, the idea is that the "bio" would function as a kind of wiki page and be editable/changeable like the claims and sources entries are. There will also be auto-generated links to wikipedia, metapedia, and possibly wikispooks. The intention is that (at least, to start) AltBase only includes essential/otherwise unreported info on the subject matter, and list of institutions/affiliations that function similar to how the tag function works now. Very similar to exactly what you describe

New Version of AltBase Released by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]SamiAlHayid 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any progress made on 'individuals and institutions' yet?

Hopefully you can include the following features:

  • Ability to hyperlink text. For example, if I write something such as:

It is debatable as to whether the concept of Gemeinschaft significantly shaped the social thought of German sociologist Max Weber.

Hopefully I can turn 'Max Weber' and 'Gemeinschaft' into a link to a 'Max Weber' individuals page and a 'Ferdinand Tonnies' individuals page, respectively.

Here, 'Max Weber' would lead to 'Max Weber'. 'Gemeinschaft' would lead to 'Ferdinand Tonnies'.

  • Link to a particular part of an individuals page:

If I click on 'Gemeinschaft', not only should it go to the 'Ferdinand Tonnies' page, but to the 'Gemeinschaft' section of the 'Ferdinand Tonnies' page, so that the reader does not have to scroll all the way down to that section.

  • Categories page:

If I click on 'German sociologist', a page with every entry under the 'German sociologist' tag appears, with links to their respective pages. 'Max Weber' and 'Ferdinand Tonnies' would both have such tags and therefore links to their individual pages would be printed on this screen.

In conclusion, 'Max Weber' would lead to 'Max Weber' (individual), 'Gemeinschaft' would lead to a 'Gemeinschaft' section on 'Ferdinand Tonnies' (individual), 'German sociologist' would lead to 'German sociologists' (category).

Correlation between Bipolar/Schizophrenia, transgenderism and Low-Testosterone at birth by spookbuster in AltBase

[–]spookbuster[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Got it

Correlation between Bipolar/Schizophrenia, transgenderism and Low-Testosterone at birth by spookbuster in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

What do you mean? There are controls in place such that screwing up the DB shouldn't be possible.

Each one of your links would be submitted individually as a 'Source', then you would add the 'Claims' for each Source (e.g. "Autism is correlated with high testosterone exposure in utero")

Correlation between Bipolar/Schizophrenia, transgenderism and Low-Testosterone at birth by spookbuster in AltBase

[–]spookbuster[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Unless there are proofreaders to help me on this, I think I might screw up the DB.

Correlation between Bipolar/Schizophrenia, transgenderism and Low-Testosterone at birth by spookbuster in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Nice compilation. Have you tried adding some of these to the altbase archive?

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Hey - have you tried adding any of your facts/sources?

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

New version is up, so you should be able to create and account and add stuff. Let me know if I can help or you have any questions/suggestions

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I've been working through a combined 'fact dump' made out of different fact dump posts on s/debatealtright,

Oh great, I'd be happy to have them added

Is there any way to submit multiple links

For a single source, "no" - but, you could put the additional links in the "Source Notes" section if you wanted to save them with the source. I would need to decouple the URLs and Sources in the database to accommodate multiple links for one source. It's probably a good idea to have those backups in the future, but the 1:1 Source:URL relationship is how I started out and it would take a significant amount of re-architecting to change that. Of course, you can change the URL for a source anytime if it breaks and you find a new one (or just report it as "broken").

I have about 20 entries which do not appear at all to have yet been added to AltBase. I have also found more links for a number of entries which have already been added.

Great. I'd say "add away" - but unfortunately right now the "sign-in" feature isn't working because of changes I had to make during the DDoS. I'm uploading a new version of the website soon (like, today or tomorrow, hopefully) with a few additional features and bug fixes, including that one. I'll let you know when that's done.

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I updated your link and added your tags. As I said earlier, existing claims aren't going to "inherit" these tags - so they'll be useless unless you wanted to add/edit material and assign those tags.

In the future, I want claims to inherit certain tags (e.g., something tagged "#IQ" automatically gets tagged "#psychology", likewise "#violentCrime" inherits "#criminology")

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Sure, thanks for your interest. I'll add them in the next update (but no sources will be automatically tagged as such, probably)

Right now logins aren't working and I haven't figured out why. If they were, you could just sign in and replace the broken link with the working one yourself. I probably won't be able to fix this for a week or so, unfortunately.

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It shouldn't be empty - https://altbaseblog.wordpress.com/about/

AltBase (Alternative-Right Database) is a publicly accessible database of sources, claims (e.g. quotes, conclusions, talking points, statistics) and images that have been suppressed, censored, or ignored by mainstream media outlets and leftist academia. These sources, facts, charts, and tables are organized through a tagging system that allows for easy querying by topic.

Basically it's an interactive database of images/sources etc. to use for your online argumentation for race-realism, IQ, etc

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Drewski 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Can you explain a little about what AltBase is? It's not immediately clear from the homepage, and the About page is empty.

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Airbus320 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

Congrats!

AltBase is down (and suffered it's first DDoS attack!) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

And we're back! Easier fix than I expected

Edit: Down again. I think I might have accidentally killed the server myself by accident but there could be more shenanigans at play

Edit #2: OK back for real this time

Is it down? by FuckKikes in AltBase

[–]FuckKikes[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

yay

Is it down? by FuckKikes in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

We're back now

Is it down? by FuckKikes in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Hi - apologies for the delay. Looks like it is down. I don't know why, I'm investigating now

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Below a posting title, there is a menu list: "comment edit share save hide distinguish delete spam remove lock nsfw spoiler crosspost"

I'm aware, but no such menu appears for me. I see:

" comment edit save hide (un)distinguish delete spam remove approve lock nsfw"

There is another option, "make announcement" let me try that

Edit: That worked. I'm still replacing that post though. Talk about what Altbase is in the post, and link to a guide in the wiki or something. Based on some suggestions I've had I think I'm going to have to overthaul the entire UI

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]Marginotions 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ABG; I have a different username on reddit. You did not look at my comment to send_nasty_stuff where I wrote "I'm a mod on reddit".

A moderator has a different display than a user. Below a posting title, there is a menu list: "comment edit share save hide distinguish delete spam remove lock nsfw spoiler crosspost" and below the text display box another list "(sorted by: new) (set as suggested sort) (disable inbox replies (?)) (enable contest mode) (make announcement) (pin to profile)"

Notice the item (make announcement). If you click that, the post you link will then become "stickied" meaning it will appear at the top of the sub contents display, with letters in bold green, and stay there. Any post can be made announcement, does not need to be in the sub.

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'll create a brand-new, better post on how to use AltBase.net and what AltBase is about in the future. This is what will "replace" the old post. I haven't figured out how to sticky yet on saidit.. I also don't see your username on reddit

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]Marginotions 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Suggestion, ABG... don't replace AltBase Info (To Be Replaced), do this instead. Create another post for introducing the sub and what it's about, and include a link to the said post, but more which can be edited ongoing, whereas the tobereplaced post becomes part of your history. Then 'sticky' the new post as an announcement, it will appear permanently above all other activities. Look at what I've done with my subs on reddit. I stickied one post titled Collection index where I included links to traffic stats, which is one of the mod tools. See my comment to send_nasty_stuff, above.

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]Marginotions 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

getting black balled by mainstream social media companies. Maybe in 2010 but not today

I have some 1st hand, provable evidence on that thread. I'm a mod on reddit, have a significant opus covering the controversial topics you guys are worried about. I've not been permanently banned yet, and suspect that if I reduce my activity there to a crawl, it may stay put for a long time. If you want to keep s/Altbase clean of JQstuff etc., you can post indirectly to my done-deal refs, no worries mate. Got questions on how to do that, let's talk about it.

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thanks. I appreciate it

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]send_nasty_stuff[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

And these are the places where its mostly intended to be used - debating normies in places like Reddit. AltBase is supposed to be for quick references for /ourguys/ in online forums where we are at a numerical disadvantage and we need to search for stuff quickly. Or for writing articles, too

Ok. Thanks for clarifying your approach. I don't think avoiding holocaust and 9/11 content on the alt base will prevent it from getting black balled by mainstream social media companies. Maybe in 2010 but not today. I say that as a former mod of the reddit 'strange statistics' sub that took a similar approach and was still banned.

I'm not necessarily opposed to hosting holocaust or 9/11 stuff at some point in the future, just not right now (actually no such rule exists for 9/11 at present). I might be amenable to changing my mind, if that's what users really want

Thanks again for clarifying. You appear to have good intentions with what you're doing and I support it. I hope that your project grows. Please let me know if can be of any assistance.

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There's plenty of JQ stuff. Just search using the tag '#Jews'

afraid to host certain content

I'm not so much 'afraid' of hosting it as much as I think its a bad strategy. Many potential collaborators will just outright refuse to work with people who question or discuss these things

I do support 'normie outreach' type approaches

"Holocaust denial" is illegal in most European countries and talking about 9/11 or the holocaust is a bannable offense on most large forums. And these are the places where its mostly intended to be used - debating normies in places like Reddit. AltBase is supposed to be for quick references for /ourguys/ in online forums where we are at a numerical disadvantage and we need to search for stuff quickly. Or for writing articles, too

I conceived it primarily for race-realism, combating anti-white and globohomo narratives on degeneracy, Islam, feminism, etc. These are all mostly Alt-Right topics, and the Alt-lite can't do race-realism or JQ. I'm not necessarily opposed to hosting holocaust or 9/11 stuff at some point in the future, just not right now (actually no such rule exists for 9/11 at present). I might be amenable to changing my mind, if that's what users really want

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]send_nasty_stuff[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm tempted to go through each of your points but haven't had enough coffee yet this morning. The bottom line is if your 'space' is devoid of discussions about holohoax, jewish power, Israel, or false flags like 911 then it's just an 'alt lite' base. I understand your hesitance to deal with the all the primary source history around WWII but you probably shouldn't market yourself as 'alt' if you are afraid to host certain content. It's just another layer of self censorship. I do support 'normie outreach' type approaches that hide JQ and holobunga talk as a strategy but there are just as many people that hide those topics because they are a controlled opposition group.

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think there also might be some confusion about what "AltBase" is intended to mean. Its a contraction of "Alternative-Right Database", not a "Base" for the Alt-Right.

I can see how the name might be confusing, I've never really received direct feedback on the branding itself

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]AltBaseGuy 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Four main reasons you can't add Holobunga material to AltBase

1) Its an extremely information-loaded, arcane topic I don't know enough about. So, I can't effectively moderate the related content

2) This topic always sidelines others topics. I know that if I open it up to the Holocaust, we're going to get dedicated users who only that post that content, drowning out other new entries and content

3) The topic turns off a lot of potential converts. A lot of HBDers, libertarians, and others who reluctantly support pro-white politics desperately do not want to be seen as "Nazis", and Holocaust revisionism is decidedly Nazi (in the public perception). AltBase might be ignored or dismissed by these people who we want to attract

4) Holocaust revisionism makes us a bigger target. I don't want to give JIDF another reason to come after this project

These are all especially relevant in the early stages of the project while I'm the only administrator and the platform is vulnerable. Allowing Holocaust revisionism is just not a good way to start, in my opinion

How can you be the 'alt base' and not talk about the holohoax? by send_nasty_stuff in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

but why? I dont think there is enough evidence showing that germans were angels.

AltBase Info (To Be Replaced) by AltBaseGuy in AltBase

[–]Fourth_stage 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Keep up the good work.