MASSIVE Breakthrough In 9/11 Investigation! - Must WATCH (with Richard Gage & Barbara Honegger) by useless_aether in 911truth

[–]PecosinRat 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny -  (0 children)

This interview explains just how important the news is that the events of 9/11 and the evidence that the day wasn't what the government said it was may be put before a grand jury. Essentially, this could mean that a jury actually gets to see the evidence that has been accumulated over the last 17 years and decide if it is meaningful. Further, the package of evidence submitted to the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney's response to it has already gotten visibility to hundreds of main stream media outlets. The act of the US Attorney's office agreeing to look at the evidence could just let the cat out of the bag by making it possible for mainstream media to discuss the evidence without having to label it just tin hat conspiracy theory. While there are lots of "...slips twix cup and lip" this is still very hopeful news.

Degrees of 911 truth by TheJamesRocket in 911truth

[–]PecosinRat 1 insightful - 1 funny1 insightful - 0 funny2 insightful - 1 funny -  (0 children)

Interesting, James. I've always felt that any arguments beyond the "asymmetrical damage versus symmetrical collapse" were unnecessary. However, I do understand what you're getting at.

Degrees of 911 truth by TheJamesRocket in 911truth

[–]PecosinRat 2 insightful - 1 funny2 insightful - 0 funny3 insightful - 1 funny -  (0 children)

Seems to be missing all the physical evidence of the towers collapsing, or am I just missing something...?