Preparing to Defend Hulsey Report

PecosinRat · 2019-03-23T02:29:14+00:00

A check of Lawyer's Committee website shows no news suggesting that they have received formal notification that a Grand Jury is being convened. The author of this article may have made an assumption that the fact that the U.S. Attorney acknowledged that the evidence met the standard for potential crimes that should go before a grand jury meant that the grand jury would be convened.

PecosinRat · 2018-12-04T01:20:39+00:00

This interview explains just how important the news is that the events of 9/11 and the evidence that the day wasn't what the government said it was may be put before a grand jury. Essentially, this could mean that a jury actually gets to see the evidence that has been accumulated over the last 17 years and decide if it is meaningful. Further, the package of evidence submitted to the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney's response to it has already gotten visibility to hundreds of main stream media outlets. The act of the US Attorney's office agreeing to look at the evidence could just let the cat out of the bag by making it possible for mainstream media to discuss the evidence without having to label it just tin hat conspiracy theory. While there are lots of "...slips twix cup and lip" this is still very hopeful news.

PecosinRat · 2018-11-14T03:37:49+00:00

Interesting, James. I've always felt that any arguments beyond the "asymmetrical damage versus symmetrical collapse" were unnecessary. However, I do understand what you're getting at.

PecosinRat · 2018-11-11T23:20:11+00:00

Seems to be missing all the physical evidence of the towers collapsing, or am I just missing something...?

PecosinRat