you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]PecosinRat 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This interview explains just how important the news is that the events of 9/11 and the evidence that the day wasn't what the government said it was may be put before a grand jury. Essentially, this could mean that a jury actually gets to see the evidence that has been accumulated over the last 17 years and decide if it is meaningful. Further, the package of evidence submitted to the U.S. Attorney and the Attorney's response to it has already gotten visibility to hundreds of main stream media outlets. The act of the US Attorney's office agreeing to look at the evidence could just let the cat out of the bag by making it possible for mainstream media to discuss the evidence without having to label it just tin hat conspiracy theory. While there are lots of "...slips twix cup and lip" this is still very hopeful news.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Barbara Honegger explained how the Pentagon was prolly just a bomb too. I don't know why more people don't consider this. Apparently there was a low flying jet that continued out to sea, and there was some weird helicopter maneuvering, possibly dropping debris on the lawn. But what if there was no plane, no rocket, no impact - except for more of the same - bombs. This makes far more sense than anything else to me.