"We seem to have found A planet that is giving off signs of biological life"

submitted by Canbot from (files.catbox.moe)

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]RankAssPalace 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

So get busy making missles, kids.

[–]hfxB0oyA 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Well, that's kinda cool.

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

For anyone who hasn't watched the whole thing, that isn't confirmed, they are keeping the details on the downlow until they understand the results better.

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yeah, but there are hints that it is more than just oxygen. Like technological signs. My guess is either radio or lights on at night.

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That wasn't conveyed in that video. Is there a more detailed source?

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

It's a quote directly from the video.

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

No it isn't. Give me a timestamp where he says there are technological signs of life. He says signs of biological life.

[–]Canbot[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh, I thought you were talking about the title. Your comment did not have any context in my inbox.

That part is my speculation based on other things I have heard. I don't remember exactly where. But I believe someone associated with the James Webb space telescope said they were expanding their search for life beyond the oxygen marker. Which to me sounds like they are just positioning themselves to take credit for something they stumbled upon.

[–]NastyWetSmear 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Ah, I see. Sorry for the confusion.
If you have any link to anyone talking about finding technology, I'd be happy to see it. I only doubt it because that's a much more remarkable breakthrough than simply finding signs of biological life, which seems like it would be much more "Front Page".

[–]SMCABwhatever 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

These two videos sound exactly the same to me

[–]BloBackEntertainment 0 insightful - 1 fun0 insightful - 0 fun1 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

that's sick!