The Income Tax' drive to Mediocrity (Rabbit Hole)

submitted by LarrySwinger2 from (rabbithole.wf)

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Edit: Preface

The info below is lawful and legal.
The citizen of country is *also** a national of that country. Both.

These are two distinctly different legal statuses but they have been equivocated to fool people into believing they are the equivalent.

Citizens are [feudal] subjects of the State. Property of the govt.

Nationals are free individuals who retain their natural Rights. They are not govt property.

Understanding this distinction will help with your understanding of the info below.

Godspeed.

_____ end preface____

Find the jurisdictional statement in income tax on individuals for your country.

Crucially, "individuals" (as in indivisible) which are natural, living persons, whom the rights and duties are within the same legal entity.

Something like: Federal "euro -country" tax code: section 1.1-1

Example: 26 CFR 1.1-1

https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/26/1.1-1

It will likely have 3 categories.

  • Citizens of your country
  • Residents (legal immigrants).
  • A third confusing label "something-something aliens"

Example:

§ 1.1-1 Income tax on individuals.
(a) General rule.

(1) Section 1 of the Code imposes an income tax on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United States and, to the extent provided by section 871(b) or 877(b), on the income of a nonresident alien individual.

The 3 individual statuses are in bold above.

  • The first is the US citizen.

  • The second is a resident (legal alien/foreigner with an extended visa, or whatever.

  • The third type of person "alien" [above example: nonresident alien] is also a native of your country, but "they are not a citizen" per say.

They are classified as "a national of" [your country], and they belong to the category of free individuals in your country.

They pay income tax on a trivial, but specific set of conditions because of various constitutional constraints of your nation.

Also, don't believe the "I'm not a person" bullshit.

Everyone is a legal person known as an "individual".

There's a number of different types of "individuals"depending upon your countries laws.

Your goal should be to identify the label of the free status and find the law where you can formally change to that status.

There's a +90% chance the label is "a national of ______", and the tax agency changed the name on their regulations to fool people.

The third "alien" group will only pay tax on a few specific tax code sections.

The citizens and legal residents will pay income tax.

Here's the US law that defines the process to

" ... "...declare my intention to become an [American] "national" but not a citizen of the United States." "

Section 302 of Public Law 94 - 241

It's a pdf of the original statute, and on a govt link.

Open the pdf and scroll down to "section 302" on the 4th page.
Read the quoted oath that is to be taken before a court.
It's legit.

https://uscode.house.gov/statutes/pl/94/241.pdf

This is the real deal.

I've already performed this, but not in a court cause I wanted a court admissable document.
I wrote this up in affidavit form signed under penalty of perjury, etc. I also included the fact that the IRS has relabeled "national" as "Nonresident alien" to identify/document the deception of equivocation.

I had my affidavit notarized, and mailed it with a tracking # to the US sec of state.
I included the mail tracking # at the bottom of my cover letter to the State Dept.

I'm now an [American] national but not a citizen. Done.

Then I sent a copy of the affidavit to the IRS in Philly, and noticed them off my permanent change of political status.

I'm 100% relieved of income tax obligations.

This isn't sovereign citizen bullshit.

I'm a free American, and I can defend my position.

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

This isn't sovereign citizen bullshit.

It's good that you highlight this distinction. I've heard about what you're saying, of course, but thought that it's specific to the USA. I'd have to do some research to find out if it's possible in the Netherlands.

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

Yep. Searched

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dutch_nationality_law

They equivocate citizen and national.

Citizens are nationals, but you can be a national but not a citizen.

Citizens are subjects of the govt.

Nationals retain their natural rights.

Wiki has a basic explanation of the difference, but it's watered down.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Citizenship_and_nationality

If a law doesn't specify or include your political class, then it doesn't apply. Period.

If the Dutch farmers knew about this political distinction and changed status, then they'd reclaim their rights and wreck the laws that are imposed against them.

[–]LarrySwinger2[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Under 'loss of Dutch nationality' it lists 'joining a jihadist group' as one of the options. Kek.

However, there's no equivalent construction here. Citizenship and nationality are treated as synonymous, and you have to migrate to another country before you can renounce the Dutch nationality. At least, I'm not able to find any information that contradicts this. What we have instead is the ability to migrate to another country inside the Schengen zone where taxes are lower.

[–]Tom_BombadilBombadildo 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Citizenship and nationality are treated as synonymous

That's the scam. They are very different under international law.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nationality_law

Nationality law is the law of a sovereign state, and of each of its jurisdictions, that defines the legal manner in which a national identity is acquired and how it may be lost. In international law, the legal means to acquire nationality and formal membership in a nation are separated from the relationship between a national and the nation, known as citizenship.[1]: 66–67 [2]: 338 [3]: 73 Some nations domestically use the terms interchangeably,[4]: 61, Part II [5]: 1–2

It's a deception.

... though by the 20th century, nationality had commonly come to mean the status of belonging to a particular nation with no regard to the type of governance which established a relationship between the nation and its people [6]: 1707–1708 ...

There it is. Citizens have a subordinate relationship to the State.
Voluntary compliance.
Voluntary servitude.

You have a choice.

... In law, nationality describes the relationship of a national to the state under international law and citizenship describes the relationship of a citizen within the state under domestic statutes. Different regulatory agencies monitor legal compliance for nationality and citizenship.[7]

If you're not a citizen, then many (most) laws cannot be applied to your legal person.

It's essentially a superior and secret political status.

and you have to migrate to another country before you can renounce the Dutch nationality

You aren't renouncing anything. You retain your nationality. 100%.

Citizenship is voluntary, but nationality is not.

You can be a national but not a citizen.

I know, because I'm already on the other side.

[–]binaryblob 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If you want to be free, you need to arrange for a military that will scare NATO away. Pretty much nobody is "free". Even in international waters, you need a flag (or a private robot navy army).

Feel free to post your "research".