Do not engage with bots

submitted by winkot from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

I'm not offended.

But you offered nothing of value in your comment with respect to the material, and that is bad for saidit, and boring for this conversation.

On saidit, everyone has the right to argue and disagree with what you say

However, rational argument with evidence is well regarded and name calling is not.

I encourage you to improve your comments by following saidit values. Particularly by being conscious of the pyramid of debate when you comment, and always trying to lift the conversation.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera. You show me written fallacies.

It's not just Biden, plenty of other liberals & democrats have confessed and committed fraud and corruption like Scott Foval (on camera of course). Did you not check the other video links? What about the non-Veritas videos?

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

I am starting to think maybe you are a bot if you see video evidence as "fake" just because you said so and regardless of the crimes being confessed or committed on camera but written articles are true just because you said so.

I am suprised you being called ActuallyBot triggered you so easily. With all the profanities and slurs I've seen on saidit, I guarantee you've been called worse things and probably didn't succeed in banning anyone, unless its on reddit.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

I show you video evidence of liberals & democrats confessing & committing fraud & corruption on camera.

I've explained several times that project veritas videos are manipulated.

Project Veritas is an American far-right activist group founded by James O'Keefe in 2010. The group produces deceptively edited videos of its undercover operations, which use secret recordings in an effort to discredit mainstream media organizations and progressive groups.

You seem to be having trouble understanding that a manipulated video is not hard evidence.

You realize that the idea of manipulation of videos is to be misleading, right?

What about the non-Veritas videos?

I responded to the video about Biden.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/

Yes. Sometimes people might send one member of a family to put the votes in a ballot box, instead of all driving down separately.

Each vote is checked off on the role. One car stopping and putting several votes in the box is not indicative of fraud, and it's certainly not indicative of fraud by liberals & democrats.

Recall that the Maricopa county recount increased Biden's margin by 360 votes compared to the official results.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

"What about the non-Veritas videos?

I responded to the video about Biden.

https://www.bitchute.com/video/xSlYEo6QtGkG/"

Another weird sentence. You didn't have to say "I responded to the video about Biden"

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

I'm not following what your issue is.

I responded to the video about Biden in this comment:https://saidit.net/s/politics/comments/bmra/hard_evidence_warranting_the_impeachment_of_joe/14c3o

How would you expect that to be said, and why does it make a difference?

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

The longer the conversation goes, the more strange your grammar and sentences become. Sometimes they're non-sensical. I am starting to think you are a bot. I don't want to waste my breath arguing against a bot. Tell your master to stop using a bot like a coward and actually log in like a human being so we can have a more proper conversation. Otherwise, from now on I am going to ignore your replies. I should've listened, never engage with bots. What a huge waste of my time.

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're not making any sense.

I clarified why I said "I responded to the video about Biden", and what it meant. I did that because in the GGP comment you seemed to have trouble understanding.

It's not as hard to follow the conversation as you're trying to make out. Not if you're a thinking human anyway.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

BEGONE BOT!

https://www.bitchute.com/video/PifrRn2neY9h/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/5VzORb57J8s1/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/i4RFJlq3QZjY/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/n3h0Q7tqt0E4/

Minneapolis

https://www.bitchute.com/video/f0rH3zsAXPRP/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/jbQmGLzZXRL7/

Wisconsin

https://www.bitchute.com/video/afDH8YHlTEkz/

https://www.bitchute.com/video/-INtMzml9HQ/

[–]ActuallyNot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Oh the irony.

[–]Armedpleb 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

ActuallyBOT