We're not grooming kids to think sex with adults is okay, we just want them to have books depicting it in the school library, even after we're called out on it.

submitted by iamonlyoneman from (libsoftiktok.com)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

LITERALLY the first picture is a larger person sucking the penis of a smaller person. They don't need to have captions with ages for you to be able to tell this is a grooming book, cheezebrain.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Even your article doesn't accuse them of showing pedophilia, it just says it is pornographic, you are full of shit dude

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

Do you like to diddle kids, or are you just a troll? It's hard to tell sometimes.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

That article does not say anything about depicting acts of pedophilia, you are being inaccurate. The article you posted does not ever mention pedophilia or anything analogous. Yes, this is some very sexual content, the article even calls it pornographic, but not pedophilic. I don't much like this book, and I think there is a conversation to be had about whether or not this is appropriate for a school library, but you aren't sticking to the facts.

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (2 children)

Shift the goalposts some more, sweaty.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

How is it shifting the goalpost, I am referencing the title of your post and have been the entire time. Your title mentions sex between kids and adults, yet the article you linked to does not

[–]iamonlyoneman[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Does my title say pedophilia? Yourself said the article doesn't mention it. This is evidence of the veracity of critical grooming theory, not pedophilia. It's a little bite of the elephant that is getting dicks into children in the future.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Thats a person on their knees, they both appear to be minors