Beginning to believe these anti-racist movements have made people more racist than ever. Normal people in my area have had enough.

submitted by PencilPusher55 from (self.whatever)

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NutsToReddit 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

It is antithetical to individualism and meritocracy. It means you judge a person not by his or her own actions or merits but by an intrinsic trait they have no control over.

[–]screwballeclipsed 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

so i am racist against hispanics cuz i see them sweat and work hard to get ahead. i am likely to hire one. so not all of them have that work ethic, but i'm racist because of that.

it's easy to judge by the group, yes, especially when a certain group is seen to be the race mostly committing crimes and attacking people. or how about a group that controls media to subvert a country or people, psychologically and control the currency to subvert a country/people economically. writing this, i can see why many think races other than white cannot be racist. but they still are.

i can see your argument, but being called a racist is nothing to me other than a word to make someone feel like they did something wrong because the accuser doesn't agree with something.

[–]NutsToReddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I mean, it's not a sin to categorize people, but race is a very broad category and individual variance makes quite a difference. You should try to categorize by more narrow groups. Like, I'm sure there are plenty of homeless jews, you can't accuse those individuals specifically of running the media. It's a certain type of rich elite that do that. Not all jews are rich elites, and not all rich elites are jews, although lets be honest a lot of them are.

[–]screwballeclipsed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

i find it odd that you would use jews to make your point.

saying jews run the media does not mean all jews run the media. jews run the media, how is it racist, when it's true? am i an anti semite if i can't be called a liar?

it seems to be the jews who are the main instigator to divide by race. the 'fellow White people' is getting old. (((who))) promotes this? it's not just one or two or a few. jews want this division by race or whatever (((they))) can use. it was class warfare 20 or 30 years ago. (((media))) owned almost entirely by jews are continually broadcasting racial separation by 'supremacy' or racism or phobias. why does it seem to always be against Whites? are that many White people racist? the (((media))) sure portrays all Whites as racist. jews want to categorize people because it's easier to it them against one another.

there are many blacks that want this whole thing to go away. i think it was the actor, morgan freeman who was quoting the (((media))) keeps bringing up race and wished (((media))) would stop.

race is a very broad category and individual variance makes quite a difference

your point is valid to a point, but let me use this example to why i don't see it your way. say, for example, there is a city. any city in the united states. let's say there's a group of foreigners that have legally immigrated there. they like the american way that is safer than the country they came from where life was dangerous because of cartels, or bombing, or poor work conditions, housing, whatever. in america these people have a safe life but they still have their old world thought train. not all understand that with hard work comes rewards. so some decide to live off the system cuz welfare is still better than the way of life they had in their previous country. where they may have had an 8th grade education, maybe. they still don't realize the pride of country. some realize pride of people, but they couldn't do that in their own country. here, they litter, they leech, they consume.

so now there's a little enclave of these immigrants having 3-7 kids because welfare promotes it. more kids=more money. these people are few at first, but then become more when the extremists or criminals that they fled from start coming to their enclave or surrounding areas. so these 'extremist or criminals' start acting the same as their original country cuz a tiger can't change it's stripes can they.

i guess my point is, will the moderate or person who just wants a better life side with the extremist or with the new country's inhabitants. they're going to side with the extremist, not only because they have seen the carnage the extremist is capable of(so don't oppose it to avoid it), but because it's a brother, cousin or countryman. so in essence, the immigrant has turned the new home into the shithole they escaped.

so i will not hang around blacks because i cannot trust them(around blacks, never relax). the internet has proven that a white should not turn their back on a black. now, i still feel the same about my black neighbor, who maintains their home better than i do mine, because i don't know who they associate with are just as civil. i have found most blacks are violent, so i include them all. it seems because the degree of violence, unpredictability and incivility, i have to categorize them all.

I'm sure there are plenty of homeless jews,

i really doubt that. i probly could have narrowed it down a little by calling them zionist jews(they all seem to promote globalism), but i think the same applies as to blacks. jews are so inherently evil that they all should go. their religious text, the talmud is so racist against everyone. the amount of however many follow it, to the evil that lies within it. i mean there are call to violence in all religious text, but the amount of all out carnage is just disgraceful. maybe most jews don't follow the talmud, but what i know of the talmud, i want to include them all.

apologies for the long text, i think it was more for me to broaden my point of view.